Bearing Life Prediction via HMM and Transfer Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bearing life prediction methods often ignore the failure occurrence time (FOT) and struggle with distribution differences between source and target domains due to varying operating conditions, leading to reduced model generalization and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A method using a hidden Markov model (HMM) to automatically detect FOT and multilayer perceptron (MLP)-based transfer learning to align feature sets from different domains, improving prediction accuracy and efficiency by extracting domain-invariant features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional life prediction methods ignore or empirically determine failure occurrence time, then the prediction process is simplified, but the accuracy of life prediction deteriorates due to loss of important degradation information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction process complexityVSAvoidlife prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The HMM automatically detects FOT by itself using the monitoring data without external intervention. The model self-learns the failure occurrence time point through unsupervised training on the degradation signals, eliminating the need for manual empirical determination while preserving critical degradation information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the empirical/manual determination method with a computational model (HMM). Instead of relying on expert experience or simple threshold-based methods, the system uses probabilistic modeling to automatically identify FOT, substituting mechanical/empirical processes with intelligent algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If samples in source domains and target domains conform to the same data distribution, then the model training is simplified, but the adaptability to different operating conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training easeVSAvoidmodel generalization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the distribution parameters of the source domain data to match the target domain distribution. Through domain adaptation techniques, the model learns to transform or reweight features so that data from different operating conditions follow the same distribution, enabling the model to generalize across varying conditions while maintaining training effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces domain adaptation as an intermediary layer between source and target domains. This intermediary process aligns the feature distributions from different operating conditions, allowing the model to learn from diverse sources without being constrained by distribution mismatches, thereby improving generalization while keeping training feasible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If domain adaptation is performed to reduce distribution differences, then the model generalization capability is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel generalization capabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial domain adaptation by focusing on the most critical features that exhibit distribution shifts. Instead of attempting to align all features equally, the method identifies and adapts only the necessary subsets of features, reducing computational overhead while still achieving sufficient generalization improvement for practical applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12033059B2Method for predicting bearing life based on hidden Markov model and transfer learning
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 SUZHOU UNIV
  • US12033059B2 patent drawing
  • US12033059B2 patent drawing
  • US12033059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses a method for predicting bearing life based on a hidden Markov model (HMM) and transfer learning, including the following steps: (1) acquiring an original signal of full life of a rolling bearing; and extracting a feature set including a time domain feature, a time-frequency domain feature, and a trigonometric function feature; (2) inputting the feature set into an HMM to predict a hidden state, to obtain a failure occurrence time (FOT); (3) constructing a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model, obtaining a domain invariant feature and an optimal model parameter, and obtaining a neural network life prediction model; and (4) inputting the remaining target domain feature sets into the neural network life prediction model, and predicting the remaining life of the bearing. In the present invention, MLP-based transfer learning is used to resolve distribution differences in a source domain and a target domain caused by different operating conditions.