Bearing Ring Hardness Gradient for Roller Fatigue Life

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques for improving the rolling fatigue life of roller bearings, such as carbonitriding, are costly and do not adequately address the high-load regions and rib breakage issues in roller bearings, leading to reduced lifespan.

Innovation Solution

A bearing ring design featuring an inner layer of tempered martensite or sorbite with a Vickers hardness of 450-550 HV and a surface layer with a raceway having varying compressive residual stress and hardness, including a high-hardness region for increased fatigue resistance and a rib with specific hardness to prevent breakage, manufactured using a heat treatment process that differentiates surface and internal temperatures for optimal hardness distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If carbonitriding heat treatment is used to increase surface hardness, then rolling fatigue life is improved, but manufacturing cost increases due to long treatment time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverolling fatigue lifeVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different heat treatment conditions to different regions of the bearing ring. The raceway surface receives high-temperature treatment to achieve hardness of 700-800 HV for fatigue resistance, while the rib and other non-contact areas receive lower temperature treatment to maintain toughness and prevent breakage. This localized quality approach optimizes both fatigue life and manufacturing efficiency without requiring uniform expensive treatment throughout the entire component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies heat treatment selectively only to the raceway surface and critical load-bearing areas rather than the entire bearing ring. By limiting the high-temperature treatment to the specific region where hardness is most needed (the raceway), the treatment time and energy consumption are reduced, thereby lowering manufacturing cost while still achieving the required rolling fatigue life improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If uniform high hardness is applied throughout the bearing ring, then fatigue resistance is improved, but rib breakage occurs due to excessive brittleness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue resistanceVSAvoidrib strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a non-uniform hardness distribution where the raceway surface achieves high hardness (700-800 HV) for fatigue resistance, while the rib maintains lower hardness (50-60 HRC) to preserve toughness and prevent breakage. This spatial variation in material properties resolves the contradiction between fatigue resistance and rib strength by optimizing each region for its specific functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing ring is functionally segmented into different zones with distinct mechanical property requirements. The raceway zone is optimized for hardness and fatigue resistance, while the rib zone is optimized for toughness and impact resistance. This segmentation allows each part to have the appropriate hardness level for its specific role, preventing rib breakage while maintaining fatigue resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If high compressive residual stress is applied to the entire raceway, then rolling fatigue life is improved, but distortion and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverolling fatigue lifeVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies compressive residual stress selectively to the raceway surface through localized heat treatment and cooling, rather than attempting to induce stress throughout the entire bearing ring. This localized stress application achieves the fatigue life improvement goal while minimizing distortion and simplifying the manufacturing process by concentrating the complex heat treatment operation only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly enhances the rolling fatigue life, shock resistance, and crushing strength of roller bearings while reducing manufacturing costs by creating a durable and long-lasting bearing ring structure.

Implementation Method 1

a heat treatment process that differentiates surface and internal temperatures for optimal hardness distribution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 2

The inner layer is made of tempered martensite or sorbite. The surface layer is made of tempered martensite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

The raceway includes a first raceway whose raceway surface is under a relatively high compressive residual stress, and a second raceway whose raceway surface is under a compressive residual stress lower than the compressive residual stress applied to the raceway surface of the first raceway

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResidual stress: Stress Relaxation

Data Source

PatentUS10393180B2Bearing ring for roller bearing, manufacturing method of bearing ring for roller bearing, and needle roller bearing
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 JTEKT CORP
  • US10393180B2 patent drawing
  • US10393180B2 patent drawing
  • US10393180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A raceway of a roller bearing includes a first raceway whose raceway surface is under a relatively high compressive residual stress, and a second raceway whose raceway surface is under a compressive residual stress lower than the compressive residual stress applied to the raceway surface of the first raceway. The raceway surface of the second raceway has a Vickers hardness of 700 HV or more but less than 800 HV. The raceway surface of the first raceway includes a portion that is harder than the raceway surface of the second raceway and that is to be in contact with at least one of axial ends of a rolling contact surface of a roller. A rib includes a rib surface having a Vickers hardness of 450 HV or more but less than 550 HV.