Variable-Stiffness Bearing Support Structure for Vibration Loads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas turbine engine bearing support structures face challenges in achieving optimal stiffness to manage operational loads and vibrations efficiently, often requiring time-consuming redesigns or modifications to meet varying operational parameters.

Innovation Solution

A method to manufacture and adjust the bearing support structure by varying the distance between attachment points and struts, allowing for customizable stiffness through a movable bearing support that can be secured at specific positions relative to the casing assembly, optimizing load transmission and minimizing vibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the bearing support structure uses a fixed rigid connection between bearing support and casing, then structural strength is improved, but adaptability to different stiffness requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidadaptability to stiffness requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing support is made movable relative to the casing assembly along the central axis, allowing the distance between attachment points and struts to be adjusted. This dynamic positioning capability enables customization of stiffness while maintaining structural integrity through controlled movement rather than fixed rigid connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The stiffness of the bearing support structure is adjusted by changing the positional parameter (distance) between the bearing support attachment points and the struts. By varying this distance, different stiffness characteristics are achieved without compromising the fundamental structural strength of the connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the bearing support structure is redesigned to meet varying stiffness requirements, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestiffness customizationVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing support structure is segmented into movable and fixed components, with the bearing support able to independently position itself relative to the casing assembly. This segmentation allows stiffness adjustment through simple repositioning rather than complete redesign, significantly reducing manufacturing time and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The movable bearing support enables post-manufacturing adjustment of stiffness characteristics without requiring redesign or retooling. The structure accommodates varying stiffness requirements through positional adjustment rather than creating multiple fixed designs, saving substantial manufacturing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the distance between attachment points and struts is increased, then stiffness is reduced for vibration management, but structural strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevibrationVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The movable bearing support allows dynamic optimization of the distance between attachment points and struts based on operational conditions. The structure can be positioned to achieve optimal vibration management while maintaining adequate structural strength, rather than being fixed at a suboptimal distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The distance parameter between attachment points and struts is varied within an optimal range to achieve the desired balance between vibration reduction and structural strength. This controlled parameter change allows tuning of stiffness without compromising fundamental structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11268405B2Bearing support structure with variable stiffness
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US11268405B2 patent drawing
  • US11268405B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a bearing support structure of a gas turbine engine, includes: obtaining a bearing support and a casing assembly, the casing assembly having first and second casings extending around a central axis and connected together via struts, the bearing support securable to the first casing at attachment points; selecting a distance between the attachment points of the bearing support and the struts as a function of a required stiffness of the bearing support structure; and adjusting a position of the bearing support relative to the casing assembly until the attachment points are distanced from the struts by the selected distance and joining the bearing support to the casing assembly at the attachment points.