Bearing Wire Rod Microstructure for Shorter Softening Heat Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost and long duration of softening heat treatment processes for bearing wire rods, which increase manufacturing costs and reduce ductility and toughness due to proeutectoid cementite precipitation during cooling, necessitate a method to shorten or omit this treatment.

Innovation Solution

A bearing wire rod composition of 0.8-1.2% C, 0.01-0.6% Si, 0.1-0.6% Mn, 1.0-2.0% Cr, 0.01-0.06% Al, and the balance Fe, with specific grain boundary characteristics and a manufacturing method involving heating, finish hot rolling, and controlled cooling to achieve desired microstructure and mechanical properties without extensive softening heat treatment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If softening heat treatment is performed at high temperature for long time to spheroidize cementite and improve cold workability, then cold forgeability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases and production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecold workabilityVSAvoidheat treatment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs spheroidizing heat treatment during the initial wire rod manufacturing process, before subsequent drawing and processing operations. This preliminary spheroidization creates a microstructure that maintains good cold workability throughout subsequent processing without requiring additional softening heat treatments, thereby reducing total heat treatment time and manufacturing cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes the spheroidizing heat treatment parameters (temperature range of 700-800°C, holding time of 30 hours or more) to achieve complete cementite spheroidization and uniform grain distribution. By precisely controlling these parameters, the treatment achieves maximum softening effect with minimal time, improving cold workability while reducing production time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If drawing process is introduced first to accelerate spheroidization, then spheroidization is accelerated, but breakage occurs due to internal defects in high carbon wire rod

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespheroidization accelerationVSAvoidwire rod integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention reverses the conventional sequence by performing spheroidizing heat treatment on the as-rolled wire rod before any drawing operations. This preliminary softening creates a more ductile microstructure with spheroidized cementite and uniform grain distribution, which can then withstand subsequent drawing operations without internal defect formation or breakage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention inverts the conventional process sequence: instead of drawing first to accelerate spheroidization (which causes breakage in high carbon wire rod), it performs spheroidizing heat treatment first to create a soft, ductile microstructure that can then be drawn without damage. This inversion eliminates the breakage problem while still achieving accelerated spheroidization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method reduces manufacturing costs by shortening or omitting softening heat treatment while maintaining high tensile strength and ductility, achieving a tensile strength of 1,200 MPa or more and a reduction in area of 20% or more, with a spheroidized microstructure and reduced cementite aspect ratio.

Implementation Method 1

heating a billet including, in percent by weight (wt %), 0.8 to 1.2% of C, 0.01 to 0.6% of Si, 0.1 to 0.6% of Mn, 1.0 to 2.0% of Cr, 0.01 to 0.06% of Al, 0.02% or less (exclusive of 0) of N, and the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities, in a temperature range of 950 to 1,050° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation (austenite formation): Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

cooling the wire rod to a temperature range of 500 to 600° C. at a rate of 3° C./sec or more, and cooling the wire rod at a rate of 1° C./sec or less

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation (austenite to ferrite/pearlite): Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

proeutectoid cementite precipitated along grain boundaries of prior austenite during cooling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProeutectoid cementite precipitation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 4

A bearing wire rod includes, in percent by weight (wt %), 0.8 to 1.2% of C, 0.01 to 0.6% of Si, 0.1 to 0.6% of Mn, 1.0 to 2.0% of Cr, 0.01 to 0.06% of Al

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolid solution strengthening: Solid Solution Strengthening

Data Source

PatentUS20230020054A1Bearing wire rod and manufacturing method therefor
Publication Date: 2023.01.19 POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD
  • US20230020054A1 patent drawing
  • US20230020054A1 patent drawing
  • US20230020054A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a bearing wire rod includes, in percent by weight (wt %), 0.8 to 1.2% of C, 0.01 to 0.6% of Si, 0.1 to 0.6% of Mn, 1.0 to 2.0% of Cr, 0.01 to 0.06% of Al, 0.02% or less (exclusive of 0) of N, and the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities, wherein a prior austenite grain size of a microstructure is from 3 to 10 μm, and a sum of lengths of high angle grain boundaries having a misorientation angle of 15° or more per unit area is from 1,000 to 4,000 mm/mm2.