Bed Bug Interceptor with Fibrous Climb Surface and Slick Pitfall Traps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bed bugs have developed resistance to various pesticides, leading to a resurgence in infestations, and existing traps often require sticky substances or are ineffective in intercepting crawling arthropods on smooth surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A crawling arthropod intercepting device with a fibrous exterior surface for attracting bed bugs and double pitfall traps with slick surfaces to trap them, preventing escape and allowing for optional killing agents in the traps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If pesticides are used to control bed bugs, then bed bug populations are reduced, but bed bugs develop resistance to pesticides over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebed bug control effectivenessVSAvoidpesticide efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical pesticide systems with a mechanical trapping system. The intercepting device uses physical barriers (slick surfaces) and mechanical traps to capture bed bugs without chemical intervention, thereby avoiding resistance development while maintaining control effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary trapping mechanism between the bed bug and its environment. The intercepting device acts as a mediator that passively captures bed bugs through its structural design (rough exterior for attraction, slick interior for trapping), eliminating the need for direct pesticide application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If smooth surfaces are used in traps, then bed bugs cannot climb out, but bed bugs are repelled by smooth surfaces and avoid the trap

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrap effectivenessVSAvoidbed bug attraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different surface qualities to different parts of the same device. The exterior surface has a rough texture to attract and facilitate bed bug climbing, while the interior trap surface is smooth to prevent escape. This local differentiation of surface properties resolves the contradiction between attraction and trapping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by making the attractive surface (exterior) rough and the trapping surface (interior) smooth. Instead of using a uniformly smooth surface that repels bed bugs, the device uses surface texture inversion to simultaneously achieve attraction and effective trapping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If sticky substances are used in traps, then bed bugs are trapped effectively, but the trap requires frequent maintenance and replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebed bug interceptionVSAvoidtrap durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces sticky chemical substances with a mechanical trapping mechanism. The slick surface trap uses physical properties (surface friction) rather than adhesive chemicals, making the trap reusable and durable without requiring frequent replacement of sticky materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively intercepts and reduces bed bug populations, monitors infestations, and evaluates pest control efficacy by using observed bed bug responses to host cues and gravity, providing a mechanical barrier and trapping mechanism that is durable and reusable.

Implementation Method 1

A rough, vertical surface is attractive to bed bugs. To walk up a vertical surface, around a human body, or upside down under a bed, bed bugs use their hook-like tarsal claws to engage fibers and surface roughness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTactile attraction:

Implementation Method 2

Smooth glass containers are used routinely to contain laboratory colonies of crawling insects because they cannot gain traction on smooth surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction reduction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

The basic insect pitfall trap outdoors comprises a container (a jar, can, or other container) buried in the soil so that the top edge of the container is at the same level of soil surface or just below the soil surface. Crawling insects and spiders fall into the trap and are unable to escape

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9066511B2Crawling arthropod intercepting device and method
Publication Date: 2015.06.30 J T EATON & CO INC
  • US9066511B2 patent drawing
  • US9066511B2 patent drawing
  • US9066511B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intercepting device (e.g. a furniture coaster device) is placed under furniture (bed, sofa, chair. etc.), other climable object, or the floor adjacent an object to intercept crawling arthropods and other crawling pests. The intercepting device can be used to monitor the presence of crawling arthropods and other crawling pests (such as bed bugs, ants, cockroaches, beetles, spiders, etc.), reduce pest numbers, and monitor efficacy of pest control procedures. The intercepting device includes pitfall trap surfaces that form multiple pitfall traps.