Bed Exit Detection Using Tactile Switches in Mattress Gap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices for detecting a person's presence or change in body position on a bed face issues with sensitivity control, high manufacturing and maintenance costs, and difficulty in attachment and detachment, particularly when using piezoelectric elements or pressure-sensitive sensors.

Innovation Solution

The use of tactile switches, commonly found in computer keyboards, arranged in a specific gap beneath a mattress biased by elastic members to detect the presence or absence of a person and changes in body position, allowing for easy attachment and maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a piezoelectric element is used as a sensor, then detection sensitivity is improved, but manufacturing cost and maintenance cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive piezoelectric elements with inexpensive pressure-sensitive sheets that can be easily replaced. The pressure-sensitive sheet is a low-cost consumable item that maintains adequate detection sensitivity while significantly reducing both manufacturing and maintenance costs compared to piezoelectric sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical piezoelectric sensing mechanism with a simpler pressure-sensitive sheet mechanism. This replacement uses basic pressure sensitivity rather than piezoelectric crystal effects, simplifying the system while maintaining functional adequacy for bed exit detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If a pressure-sensitive sensor sheet is used, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but attachment to mattress becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidattachment ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the sensing system into separate functional components: the pressure-sensitive sheet and the mattress. The sheet is positioned in the gap between the mattress and bed frame, eliminating the need to attach sensors directly to the mattress while maintaining sensing functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the gap space between the mattress and bed frame as an intermediary location for placing the pressure-sensitive sheet. This intermediary position allows the sheet to function without direct attachment to the mattress, solving the attachment difficulty while maintaining cost advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If a sensor is placed on the floor beside the bed, then device complexity is reduced, but detection reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent moves the sensor placement from the horizontal plane (floor beside bed) to the vertical dimension (gap between mattress and bed frame). This dimensional change allows direct detection of mattress pressure changes while maintaining simple device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If a sensor is placed on the bed mat, then detection reliability is improved, but patient comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidpatient comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the sensor from the mattress surface itself and places it in the gap below the mattress. This extraction removes the harmful factor of sensor presence affecting patient comfort while preserving the detection function through indirect pressure sensing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides reliable detection of getting out of bed, prevents bedsores, and is cost-effective, with easy installation and maintenance, as tactile switches are inexpensive and can be easily replaced.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic member that biases the lower surface of a mattress upward

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a tactile switch, which is applied to a keyboard of a personal computer and the like, as a sensor part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP2630941B1Device for ascertaining if patients get out of bed
Publication Date: 2018.05.30 SANIN SEIGYO CORP
  • EP2630941B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2630941B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~3A
  • EP2630941B1 patent drawingFigure 3B~4

AI summary

A device 1 for checking getting out of bed for use in a bed includes a plurality of tactile switches 6, and a controller 3 that detects the presence or absence of a person and/or change of the body position of the person on a mattress 21 on the basis of ON or OFF of the tactile switches 6. The tactile switches 6 are arranged in a gap 25 formed while a person is not present on the mattress 21 between a lower surface 21a of the mattress 21 and a floor material 26 of a bed 20 to hold the mattress 21 thereover by an elastic member (butterfly spring 23 or resin elastic member 10) that biases the lower surface 21a of the mattress 21 upward. The device 1 for checking getting out of bed can be provided at low cost, easy to attach to and detach from a bed, and easy to maintain.