Bed-Presence Monitoring With Two-Way Emergency Alerts
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing monitoring systems for elderly individuals lack the ability for the monitored person to stop unnecessary notifications and allow responders to communicate back to inform the server that they are handling an emergency, with communication being one-directional and lacking two-way interaction.
Innovation Solution
A monitoring apparatus that includes sensors, a processor, and a remote system allowing the monitored person to cancel alarms and responders to communicate back to the system, enabling two-way communication to confirm emergency handling.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If the monitoring system sends notifications to responders when an undesirable condition is identified, then the responders are informed about the emergency, but the monitored person cannot stop unnecessary notifications and the system lacks two-way communication capability
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a feedback mechanism where the monitored person can send a stop signal back to the server to cancel notifications. The server receives this feedback signal and stops sending further notifications to responders, allowing the monitored person to control whether notifications are sent when no actual emergency exists.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a communication device as an intermediary between the monitored person and the server. This intermediary allows the monitored person to interact with the monitoring system by sending stop signals, enabling two-way communication and giving the monitored person control over notification behavior.
2Reliability
If the system uses one-directional communication from server to responders, then the server can notify responders of emergencies, but responders cannot confirm back to the server that they are handling the emergency
Solution Approach 1:
The patent enables responders to send feedback signals back to the server through their communication devices. When a responder receives a notification and is handling the emergency, they can communicate this status back to the server, which then stops sending notifications to other responders. This feedback loop prevents information loss about emergency handling status.
Solution Approach 2:
The system allows responders to self-report their emergency handling status by sending confirmation signals back to the server. This self-service mechanism enables responders to independently inform the system of their actions without requiring manual intervention from the monitored person or system administrators.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
An apparatus is provided for monitoring a person. The apparatus is configured for identifying one or more undesirable conditions, by analyzing data from a sensor unit associated with the person's bed, the data being indicative of the person's presence in or absence from the bed. Upon identification of at least one undesirable condition, the apparatus emits a local alarm and transmits an alert signal to a remote apparatus, which is configured for notifying one or more responders about the undesirable condition. If one or more responders responds to the notification, or if the apparatus is reset locally, the local alarm is stopped.