Hospital Bed Safety Rail Gas Spring Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hospital bed safety rails face issues with unreliable immobilization between raised and lowered configurations, requiring excessive force to raise and potentially sudden collapse from raised to lowered positions.

Innovation Solution

A bed safety rail design featuring pivotally mounted end supports and a gas spring between the rail section and end supports, allowing the rail to maintain a horizontal orientation during rotation and utilizing locking means to secure the rail in the top position without additional locking devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a mechanical blocking means with locking pin and spring is used, then the side rail can be locked in place, but the side rail cannot be reliably immobilized and may suddenly collapse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of immobilizationVSAvoidcomplexity of blocking means
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the separate blocking means (locking pin, spring, locking hole) from the system and integrates the locking function directly into the gas spring mechanism itself. The gas spring's piston and cylinder structure inherently provides both support and locking capability, eliminating the need for additional separate locking components and reducing overall device complexity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the support function and locking function into a single integrated gas spring mechanism. The gas spring simultaneously provides the force to hold the rail in position and the mechanical locking through its piston-cylinder interaction, merging multiple functions into one component to reduce complexity and improve reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If a mechanical blocking means with locking pin is used, then the side rail can be locked, but excessive force is required to raise the side rail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of raising side railVSAvoidforce required to raise rail
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a gas spring (pneumatic element) to provide the lifting and locking force. The gas spring uses compressed gas to generate controlled force that assists in raising the rail section and maintaining it in the elevated position, significantly reducing the manual force required compared to pure mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The gas spring acts as a counterweight mechanism, providing an upward force that counteracts the weight of the rail section. This reduces the net force that must be applied manually to raise the rail, making operation easier while the gas spring's locking feature prevents sudden collapse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Reliability

If a separate locking device is used to secure the rail, then the rail can be locked, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of lockingVSAvoidcomplexity of locking device
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the separate locking device from the system. Instead of having an independent locking mechanism, the locking function is embedded within the gas spring's operational structure, where the piston and cylinder interaction naturally provides both support and locking without requiring additional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The gas spring serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides the lifting force, maintains the rail in the elevated position, and provides mechanical locking. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate locking devices, reducing complexity while maintaining reliable locking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a reliable, easy-to-use, and maintenance-free safety rail that requires less force to raise and prevents sudden collapse, ensuring the safety of both patients and caregivers by maintaining a stable configuration.

Implementation Method 1

a gas spring disposed between the rail section and the end support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas spring: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2322129B1Bed safety rail
Publication Date: 2014.12.24 MERIVAARA
  • EP2322129B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2322129B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2322129B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a bed, especially hospital bed safety rail (2), which is attached to a lengthwise (A-A) side of a bed (1). The safety rail comprises two end supports (3, 4) disposed at a distance from each other, and at least one rail section (5; 51, 52, 53, 54) disposed between the end supports (3, 4) substantially in a longitudinal direction of the bed. The end supports (3, 4) are mounted pivotally in engagement with the bed, such that the end supports are rotatable from a position inclined in the longitudinal direction of the bed to an upright position as the safety rail (2) is raised from a bottom position (B) to a top position (C), and respectively rotatable in an opposite direction as the safety rail is lowered from the top position to the bottom position. Thereby, the rail section (5; 51, 52, 53, 54) being retains, despite the rotating motion, its substantially horizontal orientation. According to the invention, the safety rail (2) further comprises a gas spring (6) disposed between the rail section (5; 51) and the end support (3).