Autonomous Bedside Wheelchair Positioning for Patient Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Patients in medical facilities who cannot walk require assistance to move from their beds to nearby movable bodies like wheelchairs, placing a burden on both the patient and caregivers, as existing systems do not efficiently reduce the workload or ensure safe transfer without manual intervention.

Innovation Solution

A movable body control system that integrates a support device, such as a bed, with a movable body, utilizing a body detection device, periphery monitor, and determination module to autonomously guide the movable body to the patient, reducing the need for human assistance and ensuring safe transfer by aligning seating heights and creating a recessed edge for stable boarding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the movable body is manually moved to the patient by another person, then the patient can be assisted to transfer, but the workload of another person increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransfer assistanceVSAvoidworkload of another person
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the movable body to autonomously navigate to the patient's bedside and position itself for transfer without requiring another person to physically move it. The autonomous navigation and positioning functions allow the device to serve itself in terms of relocation, reducing the need for manual assistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical system of another person physically moving the movable body with an autonomous control system that uses sensors, processors, and actuators to navigate and position the movable body automatically at the patient's bedside.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If the patient determines space availability and calls the movable body, then the movable body can be summoned, but the burden on the patient increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovable body summoningVSAvoidpatient operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from sensors that detect the patient's presence, posture, and environmental conditions to automatically determine when the patient needs assistance and whether the environment is suitable for transfer, eliminating the need for the patient to manually assess these conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The movable body performs self-monitoring and autonomous decision-making by detecting patient status and environmental conditions, then automatically initiating the approach sequence without requiring the patient to call or determine space availability manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the movable body waits at a position away from the patient, then space requirements are maintained, but assistance from another person is required for transfer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace obstructionVSAvoidtransfer assistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The movable body performs preliminary actions by autonomously navigating to the patient's bedside and positioning itself in the optimal location before the transfer process begins. This preliminary positioning eliminates the need for another person to assist with the actual transfer while maintaining safe operational distances when not in use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the movable body's position based on real-time conditions - remaining at a distance when not needed to avoid obstruction, then autonomously moving close to the patient when transfer is required, optimizing both space utilization and transfer assistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Extent of automation

If autonomous control is implemented, then manual assistance is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovable body controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous control system is designed with multi-functionality, using a integrated control unit that handles navigation, positioning, patient detection, environmental monitoring, and transfer coordination through a unified control architecture, reducing overall system complexity despite the extensive automation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12186250B2Movable body control system
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12186250B2 patent drawing
  • US12186250B2 patent drawing
  • US12186250B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A movable body control system includes: a movable body on which a user is capable of riding; a support device that supports a body of the user in a lying posture; a body detection device that detects a state of the user supported by the support device; a periphery monitor device that monitors a periphery of the support device; and a determination part that determines whether or not the movable body is capable of approaching the support device based on a detection result of the periphery monitor device. In the movable body control system, in a case where the body detection device detects that the user is in a predetermined state and the determination part determines that the movable body is capable of approaching the support device, the movable body approaches the support device.