Automated Bee Habitat Gate Array Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing beekeeping practices rely on manual intervention for managing beehives, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and there is a need for efficient and sustainable methods to control bee passage gates in automated bee habitats.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for controlling individually moveable bee passage gates in an automated bee habitat, where each gate is independently movable to set the size of its associated opening, and a controller operates mechanisms to control the gates based on bee traffic, environmental conditions, and other factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual intervention is used for managing beehives, then ease of operation is maintained, but productivity is reduced and time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebee habitat management efficiencyVSAvoidautomation of gate control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the gate control system automatically monitors bee traffic patterns, environmental conditions, and adjusts gate positions without human intervention. The controller receives data from sensors and autonomously actuates gates to optimize bee passage, eliminating the need for manual management while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical gate operation is replaced with an automated electromechanical system. The controller uses sensors to detect bee traffic and environmental parameters, then actuates electric motors or actuators to adjust gate positions, substituting human labor with an automated control system that increases productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single common gate is used for all chambers, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual gate control flexibilityVSAvoidnumber of gate control mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate control system is segmented into independent individual gate controllers, each managing a specific gate leading to a particular chamber. This segmentation allows each gate to be controlled independently based on specific chamber requirements, enhancing adaptability while the modular structure keeps overall system complexity manageable through standardized control units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each gate is equipped with local control capabilities and sensors specific to its chamber, allowing localized adaptation to different bee colony needs, environmental conditions, and traffic patterns. This local quality approach enables customized gate management for each chamber while using standardized control mechanisms to limit overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If gates are controlled jointly together, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision of individual gate positioning is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual gate position accuracyVSAvoidindependent control mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into independent individual gate controllers, each responsible for precisely positioning its specific gate. This segmentation enables high manufacturing precision for each gate position while the modular replicated design keeps overall device complexity manageable through standardized control units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses identical replicated control mechanisms for each gate, copying the same precise control design across multiple gates. This standardization ensures consistent manufacturing precision for individual gate positioning while reducing overall complexity through reuse of proven control modules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12324421B2Array of gates in automated bee habitat
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 BEEWISE TECH LTD
  • US12324421B2 patent drawing
  • US12324421B2 patent drawing
  • US12324421B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a system for controlling one or more arrays of bee passage gates in an automated bee habitat, comprising one or more gate arrays comprising a plurality of gates to one or more chambers of an automated bee habitat, each of the gates is individually moveable, independently of all other gates, to set a size of a respective one of a plurality of openings configured for bees passage to the one or more chambers, one or more mechanisms adapted to control each of the plurality of gates independently of the other gates, and a controller adapted to operate the one or more mechanisms to control one or more of the plurality of gates to set the size of the respective openings.