Behavior-Based Access Control With Continuous User Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing access control systems for user devices, such as smartphones and tablets, provide persistent access once unlocked, lacking effective mechanisms to dynamically adapt to user behavior changes and ensuring secure access control.

Innovation Solution

Implement a machine learning classifier to analyze user behavior, classifying it as compliant or non-compliant, and utilize credential-based authentication to confirm authorization, with constructive training to improve the classifier's accuracy over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If persistent access is provided once unlocked, then ease of operation is improved, but security deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The access control system transitions from a static persistent access model to a dynamic continuous verification model. The machine learning classifier continuously monitors user behavior and dynamically adjusts access permissions in real-time, preventing unauthorized access while maintaining convenience for legitimate users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through continuous behavior monitoring and classification. The machine learning model receives ongoing feedback from sensor data about user behavior patterns and adjusts its classification of compliant versus non-compliant behavior, enabling adaptive security that responds to changing conditions without requiring frequent manual authentication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If machine learning classifier is used to classify user behavior, then security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning classifier serves multiple functions: it classifies user behavior for security verification, adapts to changing usage patterns over time, and works across different device contexts (locked versus unlocked states). This multi-functionality justifies the complexity by providing comprehensive security enhancement rather than a single specialized function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-service through automatic adaptive training of the machine learning classifier. The classifier continuously learns from new behavior data without requiring manual reconfiguration or intervention, automatically improving its security classification capabilities while adapting to the specific user's patterns, thereby managing complexity through automation rather than manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If constructive training is performed continuously, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The constructive training operates continuously in the background without interrupting device usage. The machine learning classifier learns from new behavior data as it accumulates, maintaining continuous improvement of classification accuracy while the device remains fully functional, thus avoiding time loss through seamless parallel operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification using existing training data before new behavior data arrives, enabling immediate security decisions. Subsequent constructive training then refines the classification in preparation for future decisions, allowing the system to maintain high measurement precision without requiring time-consuming training cycles to complete before each classification event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12554811B2Access control
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 BRITISH TELECOM PLC
  • US12554811B2 patent drawing
  • US12554811B2 patent drawing
  • US12554811B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method of access control for a user device having at least one component for determining behaviors of the user. The method including accessing a machine learning classifier trained based on at least one prior behavior of the user using the device, the classifier classifying user behavior as compliant or non-compliant such that compliant behavior is determined by the classifier to be consistent with prior behavior for permitting access to the device The method further includes, in response to a determination that a subsequent behavior is classified as non-compliant, requesting a credential-based authentication of the user and permitting access to the device in response to the credential-based authentication, wherein permitting access to the device further includes constructively training the classifier based on the subsequent behavior as a compliant behavior by providing the subsequent behavior as an additional training example.