Behavior Evaluation System for Correctional Facility Communications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Correctional facilities face challenges in managing communication behaviors of non-residents interacting with incarcerated individuals, including security concerns, revenue loss, and inadequate support, due to lack of visibility into communication activities and behaviors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a non-resident electronic communications behavior evaluation system that monitors and analyzes interactions for good behaviors, providing rewards such as communication time or media credits for adhering to guidelines, thereby promoting positive interactions and reducing security risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional communication services are provided to non-residents without behavior monitoring, then ease of operation is improved, but security risks and revenue loss increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication accessibilityVSAvoidsecurity risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time monitoring of non-resident communication behaviors and provides feedback through a reward program. Good behaviors (e.g., appropriate communication content, adherence to guidelines) are detected and rewarded with communication credits, while problematic behaviors are identified and addressed. This closed-loop feedback mechanism maintains security without completely restricting communication access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary monitoring system that acts as a mediator between non-residents and the controlled-environment facility. This intermediary automatically evaluates communication behaviors, assigns rewards, and manages communication credits, reducing the need for direct human intervention while maintaining security oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If comprehensive behavior monitoring is implemented, then security risks are reduced, but device complexity and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity risksVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system operates autonomously by automatically detecting communication behaviors, evaluating them against established guidelines, and distributing rewards without requiring manual review for each interaction. The system self-manages the reward program, credit allocation, and behavior evaluation, reducing operational complexity despite comprehensive monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors specific parameters of communication (e.g., content keywords, communication frequency, adherence to guidelines) and changes the reward parameters based on behavior evaluation. By focusing on key behavioral parameters rather than analyzing every aspect of communication, the system achieves effective monitoring without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If rewards are provided to non-residents for good behavior, then positive communication behaviors are encouraged, but loss of energy and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication behavior qualityVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The reward program provides communication credits (rewards) to non-residents for demonstrating good communication behaviors. Rather than compensating for all communication costs, the system provides partial rewards that incentivize positive behavior while maintaining cost-effectiveness. The reward amount is calibrated to encourage desired behaviors without creating excessive operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11461800B1Rewards for non-residents associated with controlled-environment facility residents
Publication Date: 2022.10.04 SECURUS TECH LLC
  • US11461800B1 patent drawing
  • US11461800B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present systems and methods reward non-residents associated with a controlled-environment facility resident for good behaviors related to electronic communications with a controlled-environment facility resident. One or more controlled-environment facility associated computer systems, or the like, maintain a non-resident electronic communications behavior evaluation system, monitor and/or track a non-resident's behaviors with respect to electronic communications with a controlled-environment facility resident and analyze the non-resident behavior with respect to the electronic communications with the resident. The one or more controlled-environment facility associated computer systems, or the like, may provide rewards to the non-resident for use toward electronic communications with the controlled-environment facility resident, or the like, based on good behavior determined by the analysis of the non-resident behavior with respect to the electronic communications with the resident.