Behavior Improvement System for Self-Checking Goal Achievement
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
360-Degree feedback methods often fail to effectively reform behavior as they do not adequately promote self-awareness and improvement in individuals, leading to ineffective behavior modification.
Innovation Solution
A behavior improvement system comprising a person-in-charge terminal, member terminal, diagnostician terminal, and organization computer connected via a network, which facilitates self-checking, diagnosis, advice requests, and goal determination to enhance behavior awareness and improvement through quantitative data management.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If 360-Degree feedback is used to reform behavior, then evaluation coverage is improved, but behavior improvement effectiveness deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements continuous feedback loops where members receive automated mail requests to self-check their action plans at regular intervals. The organization computer records these self-check inputs and compares them against goals, providing ongoing feedback rather than one-time 360-Degree feedback. This continuous feedback mechanism drives actual behavior improvement while maintaining comprehensive evaluation coverage.
Solution Approach 2:
The system empowers members to autonomously self-check their own behavior improvement progress by having them directly input their self-check results in response to automated mail requests. This self-service approach enhances both the reliability of behavior improvement (through genuine self-reflection) and maintains evaluation coverage, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive evaluation and effective improvement.
2Loss of information
If self-checking mechanism is implemented, then behavior awareness is improved, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The organization computer serves as an intermediary that automates the self-checking process. It sends automated mail requests to members, records their self-check inputs, and processes the data against goals. This intermediary approach enhances behavior awareness through systematic tracking while minimizing system complexity by automating rather than manualizing the process.
Solution Approach 2:
The system replaces manual behavior tracking with automated electronic mail communication and digital data recording. Instead of mechanical paper-based self-checking, the organization computer electronically sends requests and records inputs, reducing system complexity while improving behavior awareness through consistent automated reminders and digital tracking.
3Reliability
If continuous monitoring is performed, then behavior improvement reliability is improved, but time consumption increases
Solution Approach 1:
The organization computer sends automated mail requests at predetermined intervals rather than continuously monitoring. This periodic action maintains behavior improvement reliability through regular check-ins while minimizing time consumption by avoiding constant monitoring. The system balances reliability and time efficiency through structured periodic self-checks.
Solution Approach 2:
Members autonomously complete their own self-checks in response to automated mail requests, eliminating the need for external observers to continuously monitor behavior. This self-service approach maintains high reliability through genuine self-reflection while significantly reducing time consumption compared to continuous external monitoring.
Data Source
AI summary
A behavior improvement system for ascertaining behavior reform by helping a person take notice of his/her behavior in regard to behavior modification from various sides. The behavior improvement system is executed using terminals connected to a LAN. The behavior improvement system is characterized by setting a goal for a behavior improvement, setting an action plan realizing the goal, a member periodically carrying out a self-check of the action plan to take notice of growth of a behavior within him/herself or comparing a diagnosis interview result replied by the member and a diagnostician using the same diagnosis interview sheet to take notice of a difference of evaluations between him/herself and another person, the member taking notice of his/her behavior improvement with each other member using a bulletin board function, and enabling the member to obtain an idea to be done by him/herself using advice from an advisor who is an expert.


