Behavioral Hazard Scoring From Relative Speed and Separation Distance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for assessing vehicle safety are limited by their reliance on collision data, which is infrequent and lacks linkage to causes, and do not provide a repeatable, objective, and nearly continuous measure of safety and risk, especially for automated vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A system that processes sensor data to compute a behavioral hazard measure by combining relative speed and separation distance, incorporating compensating factors and road conditions, to assess safety and risk continuously and objectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If collision data is used to measure vehicle safety, then safety assessment can be performed, but the measure is retrospective, sparse, and lacks linkage to causes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assessment reliabilityVSAvoidcausal information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by computing behavioral hazard measures from sensor data collected during normal vehicle operation, before collisions occur. The system continuously calculates hazard measures based on relative positions, speeds, and separation distances between the subject vehicle and other traffic objects, creating a proactive safety assessment framework that identifies risky behaviors before they result in collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces behavioral hazard measure as an intermediary metric that bridges the gap between raw sensor data and safety assessment. This intermediary measure is computed from sensor signals and provides a continuous, objective indicator of vehicle safety behavior, linking cause (sensor measurements of relative motion) to effect (safety assessment) without requiring collision occurrence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If time-to-collision is used as a safety measure, then a quantitative indicator is provided, but it is dependent on road conditions and vehicle speed/maneuverability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety measurement precisionVSAvoidindependence from road conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the safety measurement from time-to-collision (which depends on speed and road conditions) to behavioral hazard measure computed from relative position and separation distance. This parameter transformation creates a measure that is independent of vehicle speed and road conditions, making it universally applicable across different operating scenarios while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If disengagement count per mile is used to assess automated vehicle safety, then performance indicator is obtained, but it is subjective and influenced by operational policies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assessment efficiencyVSAvoidobjectivity of measure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by creating an automated system that continuously computes behavioral hazard measures from sensor data without requiring human judgment or intervention. The system independently processes sensor signals, calculates relative motion parameters, and generates objective safety metrics automatically, eliminating subjectivity and operational policy influence while maintaining high assessment efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If collision frequency is used as the primary safety metric, then a simple measure is obtained, but it is infrequent and cannot provide continuous safety evaluation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement system complexityVSAvoidsafety evaluation continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies continuity of useful action by computing behavioral hazard measures continuously from sensor data during normal vehicle operation. Instead of waiting for collision events to occur, the system continuously processes sensor signals, calculates relative positions and speeds, and generates safety metrics in real-time, providing uninterrupted safety evaluation while maintaining relatively simple measurement principles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3973695B1Apparatus and method for processing vehicle signals to compute a behavioral hazard measure
Publication Date: 2025.07.02 STREETSCOPE INC
  • EP3973695B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3973695B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3973695B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A non-transitory computer readable storage medium has instructions executed by a processor to obtain the relative speed between a first traffic object and a second traffic object. The separation distance between the first traffic object and the second traffic object is received. The relative speed and the separation distance are combined to form a quantitative measure of hazard encountered by the first traffic object. The obtain, receive and combine operations are repeated to form cumulative measures of hazard associated with the first traffic object. The cumulative measures of hazard are analyzed to derive a first traffic object safety score for the first traffic object.