Behavioral Pairing for Case Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current case assignment strategies in customer service centers, such as FIFO and management-based assignments, often lack confidence and relevant information, leading to suboptimal case allocations and performance issues.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method and system that uses behavioral pairing to reassess and reassign cases, combining management expertise with artificial intelligence and big data analysis to optimize case assignments, allowing for both collaborative and non-collaborative approaches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If FIFO or management-based assignment strategies are used, then case allocations can be made quickly and simply, but the assignment performance and outcomes are suboptimal due to lack of confidence and relevant information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecase assignment speedVSAvoidassignment performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated case assignment system that acts as an intermediary between cases and agents. This system uses behavioral pairing algorithms to analyze historical data, agent characteristics, and case requirements, thereby mediating the assignment process to achieve both speed and reliability. The system processes assignments automatically while incorporating sophisticated analysis that management-based approaches cannot perform at scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual management-based assignment mechanisms with an automated computational system. Instead of relying on human managers to evaluate and assign cases based on limited information, the system uses algorithms that process large datasets including agent performance history, case complexity metrics, and outcome predictions, thereby substituting mechanical human decision-making with a more reliable automated process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If management assigns cases based on available information, then assignments can be made with some rationale, but confidence is low due to lack of relevant information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment processabilityVSAvoidassignment confidence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis and data gathering before case assignments are made. The system pre-processes agent performance data, case characteristics, and historical outcomes to create ready-to-use assignment recommendations. This preliminary action ensures that when assignments are needed, the system already has processed information and confidence scores, eliminating the need for managers to gather information manually at the moment of assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where assignment outcomes are continuously monitored and fed back into the system. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from past assignments, refine its behavioral pairing algorithms, and improve confidence in future recommendations. The system tracks which assignment strategies produce best results and adjusts its recommendations accordingly, creating a self-improving loop that increases measurement precision over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If traditional assignment strategies are used, then the system remains simple to operate, but suboptimal performance is achieved in subrogation recoveries, patient care, and debt collection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment system complexityVSAvoidcase outcome performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the case assignment process into distinct functional modules: data collection, behavioral pairing analysis, recommendation generation, assignment execution, and outcome tracking. Each module handles a specific aspect of the assignment process, allowing the complex system to be managed through modular components. This segmentation enables sophisticated performance optimization while maintaining operational simplicity through clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10958789B2Techniques for case allocation
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 AFINITI AI LTD
  • US10958789B2 patent drawing
  • US10958789B2 patent drawing
  • US10958789B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for case allocation are disclosed. In one particular embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method for case allocation comprising receiving, by at least one computer processor, at least one case allocation allocated using a first pairing strategy, and then reassigning, by the at least one computer processor, the at least one case allocation using behavioral pairing.