Behavioral Pairing Constraints for Task Assignment Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional task assignment systems face challenges in optimizing performance while managing resource constraints, as optimal behavioral pairing strategies require extensive computational resources and data processing, leading to increased costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a sub-optimal behavioral pairing strategy that constrains performance by reducing technical resource requirements, such as hardware, network, and bandwidth needs, by limiting data sources, data fields, and model updates, to achieve a balanced utilization of agents and tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If an optimal behavioral pairing strategy is implemented, then task assignment system performance is improved, but computational resource requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask assignment system performanceVSAvoidcomputational resource requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting the behavioral pairing model's performance parameters to achieve a desired balance between system performance and computational resource consumption. This involves modifying model parameters such as data retention periods, update frequencies, and complexity levels to reduce computational requirements while maintaining acceptable performance levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by using a sub-optimal behavioral pairing strategy that provides sufficient performance improvement without requiring full optimization. This approach accepts that the pairing model will not achieve maximum possible performance but instead delivers adequate performance with significantly reduced computational resource requirements and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Device complexity

If a sub-optimal behavioral pairing strategy is implemented, then computational complexity and costs are reduced, but system performance improvement is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidsystem performance improvement
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent deliberately implements a sub-optimal behavioral pairing model that provides partial performance improvement rather than maximum optimization. This partial action approach is sufficient to meet performance goals while keeping computational complexity and costs at acceptable levels, avoiding the need for fully optimal but resource-intensive models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs simpler, less computationally expensive pairing models that can be implemented with reduced technical resources. These models may be less accurate or optimal but provide adequate performance improvement at lower cost and complexity, effectively using 'cheaper' modeling approaches that suffice for the application needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Measurement precision

If extensive data processing is performed to optimize behavioral pairing, then assignment accuracy is improved, but resource consumption and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment accuracyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes data processing parameters by limiting the scope, depth, and frequency of data analysis performed by the behavioral pairing model. This includes restricting data sources, reducing data fields processed, and controlling model update frequencies, thereby achieving acceptable assignment accuracy with reduced resource consumption and operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11936817B2Techniques for behavioral pairing in a task assignment system
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 AFINITI AI LTD
  • US11936817B2 patent drawing
  • US11936817B2 patent drawing
  • US11936817B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application is directed toward techniques for behavioral pairing in a task assignment system. In one particular embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method for behavioral pairing in a task assignment system comprising: determining, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the task assignment system, at least one behavioral pairing constraint; and applying, by the at least one computer processor, the at least one behavioral pairing constraint to the task assignment system to controllably reduce performance of the task assignment system.