Behavioral Pairing Model Evaluation in Contact Centers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current contact center systems lack techniques for optimizing behavioral pairing model generation and validation to improve pairing strategies and enhance overall performance.

Innovation Solution

A method for behavioral pairing model evaluation in a contact center system, involving determining agent and contact type orderings, analyzing historical data to construct a pairing model, applying a correction factor, and comparing expected performance with alternative strategies like FIFO to select the optimal pairing model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If behavioral pairing model is used to optimize contact-agent assignments, then contact center performance and resource utilization improve, but model generation and validation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact center performanceVSAvoidmodel generation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-determining agent orderings and contact type orderings before actual contact assignments. Historical data is analyzed in advance to construct the pairing model, and expected performance is calculated beforehand. This allows the complex model generation to be completed once, with results reused for multiple contact assignments, reducing real-time complexity while maintaining high performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified representation or copy of the complex behavioral pairing model through the pairing model structure that captures essential relationships between agents and contact types. This model copy can be stored and reused, avoiding the need to regenerate the full complex model for each contact assignment, thus improving productivity while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If multiple pairing strategies are evaluated and compared, then optimal model selection improves, but evaluation and comparison time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel selection accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates expected performance metrics for different pairing strategies in advance using historical data. By performing these evaluations beforehand rather than in real-time, the system can compare multiple strategies thoroughly without causing delays in actual contact assignments. The preliminary evaluation results are then used to select the optimal model for deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10750024B2Techniques for behavioral pairing model evaluation in a contact center system
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 AFINITI AI LTD
  • US10750024B2 patent drawing
  • US10750024B2 patent drawing
  • US10750024B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for behavioral pairing model evaluation in a contact center system are disclosed. In one particular embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method for behavioral pairing model evaluation in a contact center system comprising determining an ordering of a plurality of agents, determining an ordering of a plurality of contact types; analyzing, historical contact-agent outcome data according to the orderings of the pluralities of agents and contact types to construct a pairing model; and determining an expected performance of the contact center system using the pairing model.