Belief Propagation Affinity Measure Labeling Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional belief propagation techniques in labeling problems often lead to inaccuracies and increased resource usage due to the sharing of beliefs between nodes, which can hinder accurate labeling, especially in applications involving user interaction.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an affinity measure to determine the similarity between nodes, allowing beliefs to be shared only when nodes are sufficiently similar, and leveraging beliefs from neighbor nodes or solving independently when similarity is not found, thereby managing belief usage and improving processing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If beliefs are shared between nodes to assist in solving labeling problems, then the labeling process can leverage knowledge from other nodes, but this may hinder accuracy in solving the labeling problem for a node

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge sharing capabilityVSAvoidlabeling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by calculating an affinity measure specific to each node pair to determine whether belief sharing is appropriate. Instead of uniformly sharing beliefs across all nodes, the system evaluates the local characteristics of each node and its relationships, sharing beliefs only when the affinity measure indicates the nodes are sufficiently similar, thus improving labeling accuracy while maintaining selective knowledge sharing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If conventional techniques unlearn inaccurate beliefs to arrive at correct labels, then labeling accuracy can be improved, but this causes an increase in resource usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidresource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by calculating the affinity measure before engaging in belief sharing. This preliminary evaluation determines in advance whether belief sharing will be beneficial, preventing the system from engaging in unnecessary belief unlearning processes and reducing overall computational resource usage while maintaining labeling accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9214026B2Belief propagation and affinity measures
Publication Date: 2015.12.15 ADOBE INC
  • US9214026B2 patent drawing
  • US9214026B2 patent drawing
  • US9214026B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Belief propagation and affinity measure techniques are described. In one or more implementations, beliefs may be formed to solve a labeling problem for a node, such as to perform image processing. An affinity measure may be calculated that describes how similar the node is to another node. This affinity measure may then be used as a basis to determine whether the share the belief formed for the node with the other node to solve a labeling problem for the other node.