Plus-Two-Point Belt Occupant Classification via Webbing Markers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current plus-two-point belt systems, also known as backpack belts, lack an effective measurement system to collect information about the occupant's size and weight for adjusting restraint performance during vehicle impacts, which limits their ability to optimize airbag deployment and seatbelt operation.

Innovation Solution

A belt assembly with sensors and markers that determine the length of webbing paid out by the belt retractor, allowing classification of the occupant based on size, and adjust the seatbelt's operation accordingly, including the use of a second sensor to track belt movement and a processor to communicate this information for airbag and seatbelt adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If a traditional three-point belt system is used, then the belt assembly is simple in structure, but it cannot collect information about occupant size and weight for adjusting restraint performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant size and weight informationVSAvoidbelt assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces markers as intermediary objects attached to the belt webbing that serve as information carriers. These markers are detected by sensors to indirectly obtain occupant size and weight information without requiring direct measurement of the occupant, thus resolving the contradiction between information collection and system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical measurement of occupant dimensions with an optical/electronic detection system using sensors and markers. This substitution allows information collection about occupant characteristics without complex mechanical measurement devices, addressing the contradiction between information availability and system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If plus-two-point belt systems are used, then supplemental restraint is provided, but they lack measurement systems to optimize airbag deployment and seatbelt operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestraint performance optimizationVSAvoidmeasurement system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the belt assembly multi-functional by integrating both the restraint function (plus-two-point belt) and the measurement function (occupant classification) into a single system. The same belt webbing serves as both the restraint mechanism and the carrier for measurement markers, eliminating the need for separate measurement systems and reducing overall complexity while improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the restraint system and measurement system into a unified belt assembly. The markers are integrated onto the belt webbing itself, and the sensors are incorporated into the existing belt retractor or anchorage structure, combining multiple functions without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If sensors and markers are added to determine webbing length for occupant classification, then airbag and seatbelt adjustments are enabled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestraint system adjustmentVSAvoidbelt assembly with sensors and markers
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes in the form of detectable markers with specific physical characteristics (reflectivity, color, size) that allow the sensor to determine webbing payout length and classify occupant size. This approach enables adaptable restraint system adjustment through simple detectable parameter changes rather than complex measurement mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses markers as simplified copies or representations of occupant characteristics. Instead of directly measuring the occupant, the system uses markers that copy the information needed for classification, allowing the sensor to infer occupant size and weight from the marker detection data, thus enabling adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10000186B2Belt assembly including plus-two-point belt reminder
Publication Date: 2018.06.19 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10000186B2 patent drawing
  • US10000186B2 patent drawing
  • US10000186B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plus-two-point belt system is disclosed. The plus-two-point belt system includes a longitudinal webbing anchored at a first end to a seat and fixed at a second end to a retractor. The webbing is extendable from the retractor to allow an occupant to slip their arm under the webbing to provide a supplemental restraint. The webbing includes first and second portions where the second portion is retractably coiled on the retractor and the second portion has at least one conductive marker. A sensor is provided to sense the marker and a processor is provided to set an alarm when the marker is not detected.