Belt Unloading System for Parcel Containers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The parcel service industry faces inefficiencies in unloading containers due to manual, time-consuming processes that are ergonomically challenging and often require complex and expensive automation solutions, which are not widely adopted.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a mobile part with a first belt that covers the container floor and a stationary part with a traction mechanism for coupling and pulling the belt out of the container, allowing for efficient unloading and retraction using a simple, cost-effective design that can be retrofitted into existing containers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual unloading is used, then operational flexibility is maintained, but productivity is low and ergonomic conditions are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunloading speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the unloading function into two independent parts: a mobile unloading unit that can be attached to any container and a stationary traction mechanism that remains fixed at the unloading bay. This segmentation allows the mobile part to be simple and adaptable while the stationary part handles the complex automation functions, resolving the contradiction between productivity improvement and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first belt acts as an intermediary element between the container floor and the traction mechanism. It transfers the pulling force from the stationary traction mechanism to the mobile unloading part, enabling automated unloading without requiring complex mechanical connections between the mobile container and stationary infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If complex automation devices are deployed, then productivity increases, but implementation cost and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunloading efficiencyVSAvoidimplementation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the automation function into a stationary traction mechanism and a simple mobile belt unit, the system achieves high unloading efficiency without requiring complex integrated automation devices. The mobile part can be manufactured simply and retrofitted to existing containers, while the stationary part handles the complex motorized winch and belt management functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mobile unloading part is designed to be self-contained and portable, requiring no complex installation or integration with container-specific systems. It can be independently attached to any container and operated by the stationary traction mechanism, making the system easy to manufacture and deploy across different containers without custom engineering for each.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If automated unloading systems are implemented, then ergonomic conditions improve, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic conditionsVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system places all complex automation components (motorized winch, belt tensioning, controlled retraction) in the stationary part at the unloading bay, while the mobile unloading part remains simple and lightweight. This segmentation provides ergonomic benefits by automating heavy lifting and manual manipulation, while keeping the overall system architecture simple and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If existing containers are retrofitted with automation, then adaptability is maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer compatibilityVSAvoidretrofit system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile unloading part is designed as a standalone unit that can be attached to any container without modifying the container structure. The stationary traction mechanism remains fixed at the unloading bay and provides the automation function. This segmentation maintains full adaptability to existing containers while keeping the retrofit complexity low, as only the simple mobile belt unit needs to be installed on each container.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables automated, ergonomic, and efficient unloading of items from containers, reducing manual labor and operational costs while being easily implementable in existing parcel distribution centers.

Implementation Method 1

a first belt, wherein in a first state of the system a load section of the first belt is configured for covering a floor of the container, enabling arrangement of the items on the load section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3061648B1Unloading system for unit load
Publication Date: 2018.04.18 PHS LOGISTIKTECHNIK GMBH
  • EP3061648B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3061648B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3061648B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

System for unloading items (5) from a container (3) positioned in an unloading bay (18), the system comprising a first belt (2), wherein in a first state of the system a load section (19) of the first belt (2) is configured for covering a floor (17) of the container (3), enabling arrangement of the items (5) on the load section (19). In order to provide a system which has a simple structure, the system comprises a traction mechanism (7, 8, 16) for being provided at the unloading bay (18), wherein the first belt (2) comprises at least one first fastening means (6) and the traction mechanism (7, 8, 16) comprises at least one second fastening means (30) for coupling the first belt (2) to the traction mechanism (7, 8, 16), wherein the traction mechanism (7, 8, 16) is configured such that at least a part of the load section (19) of the coupled first belt (2) can be pulled out of the container (3) by means of the traction mechanism (7, 8, 16), in order to bring the system from the first state to a second state.