Bendable Intraoral Sensor with Differential Bending Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional intraoral X-ray sensors are either film-based, leading to image distortion and inefficiency, or rigid digital sensors that cause discomfort due to inflexibility, and there is a need for a sensor that can bend to accommodate the shape of intraoral structures during imaging.

Innovation Solution

A bendable intraoral sensor with distinct bending properties along its major and minor axes, featuring a rear-side support and a flexible design that includes a sensor panel, a scintillator layer, and a flexible printed circuit board, allowing for controlled bending to minimize discomfort and image distortion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a rigid digital intraoral sensor is used, then image distortion is reduced, but patient comfort deteriorates due to inflexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage distortionVSAvoidpatient comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor is divided into a first area (center part) and a second area (end parts) with different bending characteristics. The first area has limited bendability to maintain image quality, while the second area has higher bendability to improve patient comfort during insertion and positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the sensor are designed with different mechanical properties. The center region maintains rigidity for accurate imaging, while the end regions are made more flexible to adapt to oral structures and reduce discomfort during procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If a fully bendable sensor is used, then patient comfort is improved, but image distortion increases due to excessive bending

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient comfortVSAvoidimage distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor is divided into a first area (center part) and a second area (end parts) with different bending characteristics. The first area has limited bendability to maintain image quality, while the second area has higher bendability to improve patient comfort during insertion and positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bending angle parameters are controlled within specific ranges: the first area bends at 160° to 180° while the second area bends at 110° to 180°, allowing differential bending that balances comfort and image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid sensor structure is used, then structural stability is maintained, but adaptability to intraoral structures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to intraoral structures
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor is divided into a first area (center part) and a second area (end parts) with different bending characteristics. The first area has limited bendability to maintain image quality, while the second area has higher bendability to improve patient comfort during insertion and positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor transitions from a completely rigid structure to a dynamically adaptable structure where the end parts can bend to accommodate various intraoral geometries while the center maintains sufficient stability for accurate imaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sensor effectively reduces patient discomfort and minimizes image distortion by accommodating the shape of intraoral structures while maintaining the accuracy of X-ray imaging.

Implementation Method 1

a scintillator layer that covers the photoelectric transducer element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Implementation Method 2

a photoelectric transducer element formed on the semiconductor substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3178398B1Intraoral sensor
Publication Date: 2024.09.25 RAYENCE
  • EP3178398B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3178398B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3178398B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The present invention relates to an intraoral sensor for intraoral X-ray photography, and provides an intraoral sensor bending along an intraoral structure during intraoral X-ray photography, wherein the degree of bending of a first region corresponding to a part facing the major axis differs from that of a second region corresponding to the remaining part.