Multi-Sample Bending Fatigue Testing with Optical Crack Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current material testing methods, particularly for aerospace and additive manufacturing, are time-consuming and inefficient, requiring extensive testing to establish rigorous statistical limits due to variations in material properties and defects, which hinders the speed of innovation and qualification processes.

Innovation Solution

A high-throughput, multi-sample testing process using a bending fatigue system that allows for simultaneous testing of multiple samples, employing optical imaging to identify cracks and create predictive models for crack growth rates, enabling faster qualification and certification of materials, especially for additive manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional single-sample testing methods are used, then measurement precision and reliability are maintained, but productivity is severely limited and testing time is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting throughputVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the testing system into multiple independent testing stations arranged in parallel, with each station capable of testing one or more samples simultaneously. This segmentation allows the system to process multiple samples concurrently, dramatically increasing throughput while maintaining the reliability of individual tests through dedicated testing zones and independent data acquisition systems for each station.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple testing functions into a single integrated system that can handle various test types (fatigue, tensile, compressive) across multiple samples simultaneously. The system merges sample loading, actuation, optical monitoring, and data acquisition into unified automated workflows that operate across all testing stations, maximizing productivity while maintaining measurement precision through centralized control and calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If extensive testing is conducted to establish statistical limits, then reliability and measurement precision are improved, but productivity decreases and time loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatistical confidenceVSAvoidqualification speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization testing on representative samples to establish baseline material properties and variability before conducting full qualification testing. This preliminary action allows the system to define tighter statistical confidence intervals earlier in the process, reducing the total number of tests required for full qualification while maintaining reliability through the automated collection and analysis of microstructural data that informs subsequent testing parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements real-time feedback loops where optical systems continuously monitor sample behavior during testing, and microstructural analysis provides ongoing feedback on material response. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of testing parameters and early detection of failure modes, allowing the system to accumulate statistically significant data more rapidly while maintaining high reliability through continuous validation of test results against predicted performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If multiple samples are tested simultaneously, then productivity and reduction of time loss are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-sample testing capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs testing stations with universal components that can accommodate different sample types and test configurations. The actuation systems, optical monitoring apparatus, and data acquisition hardware are designed to handle fatigue, tensile, and compressive testing across multiple samples using standardized interfaces and fixtures. This universality reduces the complexity that would otherwise arise from having separate dedicated systems for each test type, as the same core infrastructure serves multiple functions across all testing stations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces automated sample handling fixtures and standardized mounting interfaces as intermediaries between the samples and testing apparatus. These intermediary components simplify the connection between diverse sample geometries and the testing system, providing uniform load application and positioning mechanisms that reduce the complexity of adapting the system to different test configurations while enabling simultaneous multi-sample testing through automated sample changeover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If traditional testing methods are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but loss of time and productivity are severely impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated sample loading, positioning, and changeover mechanisms that operate without continuous operator intervention. The testing stations automatically sequence through multiple samples, with the optical systems and data acquisition equipment self-configuring for each test based on pre-programmed parameters. This self-service capability dramatically improves productivity by eliminating manual setup time between samples while maintaining ease of operation through centralized control interfaces that allow operators to monitor and adjust tests without direct physical intervention at each station.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces testing time by up to 60 times compared to traditional methods, enhances consistency, and allows for faster qualification of materials, accommodating the agility needed in additive manufacturing while adhering to recognized testing standards.

Implementation Method 1

fatigue testing of sample materials using mechanical bending

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFatigue: Fatigue

Implementation Method 2

applying axial loads repeatedly for a predetermined number of 'cycles'

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclic loading:

Implementation Method 3

an optical system takes images of the samples and cracks are identified in the samples using the images

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical imaging: Photography

Data Source

PatentUS20240094103A1Mechanical testing of sample materials
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 MRL MATERIALS RESOURCES LLC
  • US20240094103A1 patent drawing
  • US20240094103A1 patent drawing
  • US20240094103A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for testing material samples comprises stressing samples under test by bending the samples with a bending fatigue system. During testing, an optical system takes images of the samples and cracks are identified in the samples using the images. Input variables and spatial variables for use in microstructure analysis of the images are determined and used to create a model. Based on the model, crack growth rates are predicted for untested microstructures based on the samples based on the analysis of the images.