Automated Benefit Claim Wizard and Appeal Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of filing and managing government benefits, such as Social Security claims, is tedious, time-consuming, and complex, especially when initial conditions change or when appeals are necessary, as it requires navigating various forms and procedures, which can be confusing for claimants and their representatives.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system and method that guides users through the benefit claim process with an intake wizard, automating form completion, tracking, and appeal processes, allowing for efficient data input, tracking of application status, and handling of medical and administrative tasks, including the ability to modify submitted data and respond to denials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processes are used for filing and managing government benefits claims, then users can complete the process with basic tools, but the process becomes tedious, time-consuming, and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim processing speedVSAvoidtime required to complete intake forms
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated form completion where the computer-implemented system automatically populates benefit claim forms with user-provided information, eliminating manual data entry and reducing the time required to complete intake forms while maintaining user control over the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-populating forms with available data before final submission, automatically gathering and organizing claim information in advance, which reduces the time needed for form completion and streamlines the overall claim processing workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If automated systems are implemented to streamline the claim process, then processing efficiency improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim processing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by integrating multiple capabilities into a single platform: automated form completion, claim tracking, appeal management, and communication with government agencies, which improves processing efficiency across multiple tasks while presenting a unified interface to users that masks the underlying complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between users and government agencies, handling complex communications, form submissions, and status tracking automatically, which simplifies the user experience while managing the intricate interactions with multiple government systems in the background

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the system provides comprehensive guidance through the appeal process, then appeal accuracy improves, but the time required to navigate procedures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveappeal filing accuracyVSAvoidtime to respond to denials
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback mechanisms that guide users through the appeal process by analyzing denial reasons, suggesting appropriate appeal strategies, and automatically populating appeal forms with relevant information from the original claim, which improves appeal accuracy while reducing the time users need to spend navigating complex procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of denial decisions and automatically prepares appeal documentation in advance, gathering necessary information and formatting appeals before user review, which ensures accurate appeal filings while minimizing the time users need to invest in the appeal process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12141883B2Claim and progression management
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 ADVOCACY SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US12141883B2 patent drawing
  • US12141883B2 patent drawing
  • US12141883B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is a computer implemented method and system for gathering information from a user related to, filing for, and obtaining government benefits, such as Social Security benefits. The present invention also enables the user to track the benefit application approval process and reminders when certain data or responses are due. There is a feature which enables the user to modify the data submitted for the benefits when circumstances warrant. There is also a decision appeal process feature.