Benefits Account Transaction API With Threshold Enforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic transaction portal technologies struggle with inefficient resource allocation, excessive server-client requests, processing delays, increased bandwidth usage, and erroneous transactions that exceed IRS contribution threshold limits in flexible spending accounts.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a multi-purse debit card system with an electronic transaction portal that manages transactions from heterogeneous funding sources, applies enforcement rules to prevent threshold limit exceedance, and provides real-time adjudication and notification of claims.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing electronic transaction portal technologies are used to manage transactions from multiple heterogeneous funding sources, then transaction functionality is provided, but excessive server-client requests and processing delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvetransaction processing efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing delays

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing enforcement rules that define threshold limits for electronic benefits accounts, pre-configuring multi-purse debit card structures with multiple funding sources, and pre-processing transaction authorization checks before actual transactions occur. This prevents excessive server-client requests and reduces processing delays by having rules and structures ready in advance.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary enforcement engine that mediates between transaction requests and account limits. This intermediary component processes transactions through a standardized enforcement framework that checks threshold limits and manages multi-purse debit card transactions, reducing the complexity of direct server-client interactions and minimizing processing delays.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If existing electronic transaction portal technologies handle multiple funding sources, then transaction capability is maintained, but erroneous transactions exceeding IRS contribution threshold limits occur

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvetransaction accuracyVSAvoiderroneous transactions exceeding threshold limits

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by pre-establishing enforcement rules that prevent erroneous transactions before they occur. The enforcement engine proactively checks transaction amounts against IRS contribution threshold limits and multi-purse debit card purse balances, blocking transactions that would exceed limits rather than allowing them and correcting errors afterward.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the enforcement engine continuously monitors transaction status, account balances across multiple purses, and threshold limit compliance. This feedback loop provides real-time information about transaction validity and threshold compliance, enabling the system to prevent erroneous transactions and maintain accuracy across multiple heterogeneous funding sources.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If existing resource allocation technologies are used in electronic transaction portals, then basic transaction processing is provided, but excessive bandwidth usage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidbandwidth usage

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple transaction management functions into a single integrated enforcement engine that handles transactions from multiple heterogeneous funding sources through a unified framework. This consolidation reduces the number of separate server-client communication cycles and bandwidth-intensive operations required for transaction processing, while maintaining comprehensive transaction management capabilities.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12561657B2Systems and methods for allocating resources via information technology infrastructure

Publication Date: 2026.02.24 ALEGEUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC

AI summary

A system to allocate resources via information technology infrastructure is described. A server includes processors to provide to a plurality of devices, an electronic benefits account transaction application programming interface (“API”) configured to receive transaction requests from a plurality of heterogeneous electronic funding sources. The server can receive a request to initiate a single transaction to fund an electronics benefit account. The server can transmit data in an alert format indicating a denial of the single request responsive to a comparison of a value to one or more threshold limits.