Bent Monopole Antenna with Shared Segments for Tri-Band WiMAX

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-band antennas are often too large for portable devices and suffer from inefficiencies due to plus-shaped junctions, which lead to uneven signal distribution across frequency bands.

Innovation Solution

A tri-band antenna design featuring three bent monopoles with a shared feedline segment and distinct segment widths, forming a T-junction, allowing for efficient signal distribution across 2.3-2.7 GHz, 3.3-3.7 GHz, and 5.8 GHz WiMAX bands with a compact layout.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a plus-shaped junction is used in multi-band antenna design, then multiple frequency bands can be covered, but the antenna size becomes too large for portable devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-band coverageVSAvoidantenna size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple monopole branches into a compact T-junction configuration where branches are positioned closer together and share common feedline segments. This combining approach reduces the overall antenna footprint while maintaining multi-band functionality through shared structural elements and optimized current paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a planar plus-shaped layout to a three-dimensional bent monopole structure. By bending the monopole branches in multiple directions and utilizing vertical space, the antenna achieves compact horizontal footprint while maintaining the electrical length required for multi-band operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a plus-shaped junction is used in multi-band antenna design, then multiple frequency bands can be covered, but signal distribution becomes uneven across bands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-band coverageVSAvoidsignal distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different segment widths to different parts of the antenna structure. The feedline segment has a first width, while the monopole branches have different widths optimized for their respective frequency bands. This local variation in dimensional properties enables tailored impedance matching and uniform signal distribution across all three frequency bands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the geometric parameters of the antenna structure, specifically varying the width of different segments and the bend angles of monopole branches. These parameter changes are optimized to achieve consistent signal distribution across WiMAX bands 2.3-2.7 GHz, 3.3-3.7 GHz, and 5.8 GHz, preventing the uneven signal distribution characteristic of plus-shaped junctions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple antennas are used for different frequency bands, then communication performance in each band is optimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication performanceVSAvoidantenna system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a single antenna structure that universally serves multiple frequency bands through three bent monopole branches. Each branch is configured to resonate at a specific WiMAX band, allowing one antenna system to replace multiple separate antennas while maintaining optimized communication performance for each band.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the antenna into three distinct bent monopole branches, each optimized for a specific frequency band. This segmentation allows each branch to be independently tuned for its target band while sharing common feedline infrastructure, reducing overall complexity compared to using three separate complete antenna systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8188925B2Bent monopole antenna with shared segments
Publication Date: 2012.05.29 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US8188925B2 patent drawing
  • US8188925B2 patent drawing
  • US8188925B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bent monopole antenna with shared segments is capable of tri-band communication. In an example embodiment, an antenna assembly includes a substrate, a first bent monopole, a second bent monopole, and a third bent monopole. The first, second, and third bent monopoles are disposed on the substrate. The first bent monopole includes a feedline segment and a first segment. The second bent monopole includes the feedline segment and the first segment. The third bent monopole includes the feedline segment and a second segment. The first, second, and third bent monopoles share the feedline segment, while the first and second bent monopoles also share the first segment. A T-junction is formed by the feedline segment, the first segment, and the second segment. In an example implementation, the first segment has a first width, and the second segment has a second width, with the first width being greater than the second width.