Bent Tube Cooling Element for Pyrometallurgical Reactor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing cooling elements for pyrometallurgical reactors, such as sand casting and machining, face issues with uneven attachment, high material costs, and inefficient heat transfer due to incomplete bonding between cooling pipes and cast materials, as well as limitations in size and quality control costs.

Innovation Solution

The cooling element is formed using bent tube material with connections for attaching to the reactor wall, where the space inside the loop is filled with graphite, reducing material usage and allowing for easier manufacturing and installation, with the option of using two nested channels for enhanced cooling efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If sand casting is used to manufacture cooling elements with cooling pipes, then manufacturing cost is reduced and independence from dimensions is achieved, but uneven attachment occurs between piping and cast material causing incomplete bonding and inefficient heat transfer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidattachment uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling element is divided into modular components: a cast body and separate cooling pipes. The pipes are inserted into cavities in the mold before casting, creating discrete bonding interfaces rather than requiring uniform attachment across entire surfaces. This segmentation allows for simpler manufacturing while achieving adequate bonding at specific locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Cooling pipes are positioned and secured in the mold cavity before the casting process begins. This preliminary placement ensures proper positioning and creates bonding surfaces before the cast material is poured, preventing uneven attachment and ensuring consistent heat transfer pathways from the outset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If phosphorus is mixed with copper to improve metallic bond between piping and cast material, then bonding is improved, but heat transfer properties (thermal conductivity) are significantly weakened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding qualityVSAvoidheat transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The problematic phosphorus additive is removed from the copper alloy composition. Instead of relying on chemical bonding enhancers that compromise thermal conductivity, the design uses clean copper material with mechanical bonding methods (such as expansion joints, grooves, or mechanical interlocking) to achieve adequate attachment without sacrificing heat transfer properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The alloy composition is changed by removing phosphorus and other bonding-enhancing additives that compromise thermal conductivity. The focus shifts to optimizing the copper base material properties and mechanical bonding methods to achieve sufficient bonding strength while maintaining high thermal conductivity for efficient heat transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If glass tubing is used for cooling channels and X-ray photography is performed for quality control, then tightness against leaks is guaranteed, but manufacturing cost increases considerably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetightness qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The design uses inexpensive metal piping materials instead of expensive glass tubing. The metal pipes are inherently more durable and can be manufactured at lower cost. While X-ray inspection adds cost, alternative inspection methods such as pressure testing or visual inspection of the simpler metal construction may provide adequate quality control at reduced cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling channel material is changed from glass to metal, fundamentally altering the manufacturing and inspection parameters. Metal pipes allow for different fabrication methods (welding, threading, mechanical joints) and inspection approaches that may be less costly than X-ray photography, while maintaining or improving reliability through the inherent strength and ductility of metal materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If rolled copper plate is used and channels are machined into it, then dense strong structure and good heat transfer are achieved, but dimensional limitations and high cost occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural densityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and size limitation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of machining channels through solid copper plate, the design uses separate cooling pipes inserted into cavities in the cast body. This segmentation eliminates the need for expensive and dimensionally limited machining operations, allowing for larger components to be manufactured using casting processes that are more cost-effective and scalable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical machining process is replaced with a casting process. Rather than removing material through machining to create channels, the cooling pipes are positioned in the mold and the body is cast around them. This substitution eliminates machining costs and dimensional limitations while maintaining structural integrity through the casting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces material costs, simplifies manufacturing and installation, enhances heat transfer efficiency, and minimizes machining requirements, while ensuring gas-tightness and predictable quality control, making it more cost-effective and efficient compared to traditional methods.

Implementation Method 1

heat coming to the refractory surface is transferred via the cooling element to water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

heat coming to the refractory surface is transferred via the cooling element to water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentEP2427578B1Method for producing a cooling element for pyrometallurgical reactor and the cooling element
Publication Date: 2015.04.08 LUVATA ESPOO OY
  • EP2427578B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2427578B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2427578B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Cooling element (2) for pyrometallurgical reactors and method of manufacturing the element, wherein at least one cooling channel (1) having two ends is provided first. Each end of the cooling channel (1) has connection means (17) for cooling medium and at least one cooling channel (1) is connected connecting means to a wall of pyrometallurgical reactor. Further, at least one tube having an outer cross section and inner cross section is formed and the tube bent to an open loop to form at least one cooling channel, the ends of which being joinable to the means (3) for connecting the cooling channel (1) to a wall of pyrometallurgical reactor.