BEOL Non-Planar Transistors Using Amorphous Oxide Semiconductors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Integrated circuit dies currently only incorporate planar transistors in the front-end-of-line (FEOL) portion, limiting transistor density due to the high thermal budget required for their formation, which destroys back-end-of-line (BEOL) components, preventing transistors from being integrated into the BEOL portion.

Innovation Solution

Fabrication of multi-gate, non-planar transistors using the BEOL process with amorphous oxide semiconductor materials like indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO), allowing for their integration into the BEOL portion of the die, where they provide improved electrostatics and increased functionality per unit area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If planar transistors are fabricated in the FEOL portion using high thermal budget processes, then transistor functionality is achieved, but the high temperature destroys BEOL components and prevents transistor integration in the BEOL portion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor densityVSAvoidthermal budget
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the transistor fabrication process into two distinct segments: FEOL processes for initial transistor formation and BEOL processes for additional transistor formation. This segmentation allows different thermal budgets to be applied to different portions of the die, enabling high-temperature FEOL processing without damaging BEOL components, and subsequently enabling BEOL transistor formation at lower temperatures that preserve existing BEOL structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional planar transistor integration to three-dimensional integration by forming transistors in both the FEOL and BEOL portions of the die. This vertical stacking approach allows transistors to be integrated in multiple layers, dramatically increasing transistor density without requiring proportional increases in die area, while the BEOL transistors are formed at temperatures compatible with existing BEOL structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If only planar transistors are integrated in the FEOL portion, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but transistor density and functionality per unit area are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor densityVSAvoidintegration structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the die into FEOL and BEOL portions with distinct transistor integration schemes. The FEOL portion contains traditional planar transistors formed at high temperatures, while the BEOL portion contains transistors formed at lower temperatures. This segmentation enables each region to be optimized for its specific requirements, achieving high overall transistor density while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through established process separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material structures in the BEOL transistors, utilizing amorphous oxide semiconductor channels combined with metal gates and various dielectric layers. This composite approach enables transistor formation at BEOL-compatible temperatures while achieving superior electrostatic control and performance, thereby increasing functionality per unit area without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Area of stationary object

If transistors are integrated only in the FEOL portion, then process simplicity is maintained, but the die area utilization is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedie area utilizationVSAvoidfabrication process
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the vertical dimension by integrating transistors in both the FEOL and BEOL portions of the die, effectively stacking transistor layers. This three-dimensional integration approach dramatically improves die area utilization, as transistors are distributed throughout the vertical depth of the die rather than being confined to a single planar layer, thereby increasing the number of transistors per unit area without requiring larger die dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the BEOL portion multi-functional by enabling it to serve both as the interconnect region and as a transistor integration region. The BEOL structures (interconnect lines, vias, and dielectric layers) simultaneously provide electrical connectivity and serve as the foundation for transistor formation, thereby improving die area utilization without adding separate dedicated transistor regions or complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10644140B2Integrated circuit die having back-end-of-line transistors
Publication Date: 2020.05.05 INTEL CORP
  • US10644140B2 patent drawing
  • US10644140B2 patent drawing
  • US10644140B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Integrated circuit dies having multi-gate, non-planar transistors built into a back-end-of-line portion of the die are described. In an example, non-planar transistors include an amorphous oxide semiconductor (AOS) channel extending between a source module and a drain module. A gate module may extend around the AOS channel to control electrical current flow between the source module and the drain module. The AOS channel may include an AOS layer having indium gallium zinc oxide.