Best-M CQI Feedback with PMI for MIMO Channel Utilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The deployment of multi-antenna systems in wireless communications is limited by increased cost, complexity, and power consumption, and existing methods struggle to efficiently provide channel state information feedback in frequency division duplex systems, which affects the performance of MIMO systems in cellular networks.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for adaptive best-M CQI feedback together with PMI feedback, where feedback messages are generated and communicated from a mobile station to a base station, including CQI and PMI information associated with selected reporting units, and aggregate CQI information is used to select modulation, coding, and pre-coding matrices for scheduled transmissions, optimizing channel utilization and reducing feedback complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multi-antenna systems are deployed to increase system capacity and throughput, then system capacity and throughput are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the channel state information feedback into multiple CQI reporting units, each covering different time-frequency resources. This segmentation allows the system to provide detailed channel quality information for specific resources while reducing overall feedback complexity, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive channel information and feedback overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements best-M CQI feedback where only the M best (highest quality) CQI reporting units are selected and fed back, rather than reporting all channel state information. This partial action approach provides sufficient channel quality information for optimal transmission while significantly reducing feedback overhead and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If detailed channel state information feedback is provided for all time-frequency resources, then channel utilization is improved, but feedback complexity and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel utilizationVSAvoidfeedback complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant channel state information by selecting the best-M CQI reporting units that represent the highest quality time-frequency resources. This extraction approach provides the transmitter with sufficient information to optimize channel utilization while minimizing feedback complexity by excluding redundant or low-quality reporting units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing detailed CQI feedback for specific high-quality time-frequency reporting units rather than uniform feedback across all resources. This allows the system to focus feedback efforts on the most important channels, improving channel utilization where it matters most while reducing overall feedback complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If CQI and PMI feedback is provided for multiple reporting units to optimize MIMO transmission, then transmission performance is improved, but feedback overhead and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission performanceVSAvoidfeedback overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses partial action by selecting only the best-M CQI reporting units for feedback, providing sufficient transmission performance information for the most important time-frequency resources while keeping feedback overhead manageable. This selective approach maintains reliability for critical transmissions without excessive feedback requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If aggregate CQI information is used for scheduling decisions, then scheduling efficiency is improved, but precision of channel quality assessment is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling efficiencyVSAvoidchannel quality assessment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments channel quality assessment into individual CQI reporting units with specific time-frequency associations. This segmentation allows the scheduler to make efficient decisions by selecting the best-M reporting units, achieving both scheduling efficiency through systematic selection and measurement precision through detailed per-unit CQI values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8761790B2Method and system for best-M CQI feedback together with PMI feedback
Publication Date: 2014.06.24 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US8761790B2 patent drawing
  • US8761790B2 patent drawing
  • US8761790B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of a method and system for best-M CQI feedback together with PMI feedback may include generating a plurality of feedback messages, which may be communicated from a mobile station to a base station, wherein at least one of the generated plurality of feedback messages may be associated with each corresponding selected one of a plurality of Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) reporting units. The at least one of the generated feedback messages may comprise CQI information and Pre-coding Matrix Index (PMI) information, which may both be associated with the selected one of the plurality of CQI reporting units. At least one other of the generated plurality of feedback messages may comprise an aggregate CQI information, which is based on one or more of the plurality of CQI reporting units.