Bevel Gear Cutter Consolidation for Part Family Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bevel and hypoid gear cutting processes require multiple cutter heads with slightly different blade geometries for each member of a part family, leading to increased costs and inefficiencies due to manual intervention and the need for separate cutter heads, resulting in unacceptable tooth contact, increased noise, and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A multi-step method for gear cutter job consolidation, involving the definition of a temporary master, creation of a virtual master, and determination of optimized machine settings to produce a single cutter capable of cutting multiple members of a part family, minimizing blade geometry variations and ensuring correct tooth thickness and pressure angle deviations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If multiple cutter heads with different blade geometries are used for each member of a part family, then each member can be cut with precise geometry, but the cost and complexity of tooling increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade geometry precisionVSAvoidcutter head variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal cutter head design that can cut multiple members of a part family by incorporating adjustable blade positioning mechanisms and interchangeable blade components. The cutter head is designed with modular architecture allowing it to adapt to different gear specifications without requiring completely different cutter heads for each part variant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces dynamic adjustment capabilities to the cutter head, including adjustable blade positions, variable cutting parameters, and adaptive positioning systems. These dynamic features allow the same cutter head to be reconfigured for different members of a part family, replacing the static approach of using multiple fixed-geometry cutter heads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If separate cutter heads are used for each part family member, then optimal tooth contact can be achieved for each specific geometry, but manual intervention and setup time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth contact qualityVSAvoidsetup and manual intervention time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service features through automated blade positioning systems and computer-controlled adjustment mechanisms. The cutter head can automatically configure itself for different part family members based on programmed parameters, eliminating the need for manual setup and intervention that would otherwise be required when switching between different cutter heads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes parameter changes to achieve different cutting geometries with a single cutter head. By programmatically adjusting cutting parameters such as blade position, rotation speed, feed rate, and engagement depth, the system can optimize tooth contact for each member of the part family without physical reconfiguration or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple cutter heads are maintained for different part family members, then specific geometry requirements are met, but logistical costs and handling complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear geometry accuracyVSAvoidcutter head handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functionality of multiple specialized cutter heads into a single multi-functional cutter head system. This consolidation combines various blade geometries and cutting capabilities into one unified tool, eliminating the need to manufacture, store, transport, and handle multiple separate cutter heads while maintaining the ability to produce accurate geometries for different part family members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If blade geometries are consolidated across a part family, then tooling costs decrease, but tooth thickness and pressure angle deviations may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter head consolidationVSAvoidtooth thickness accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent compensates for blade geometry consolidations by dynamically adjusting cutting parameters such as blade position, engagement depth, rotation speed, and feed rate. These parameter changes allow the system to achieve accurate tooth thickness and pressure angle measurements even when using a consolidated cutter head design, thereby maintaining manufacturing precision while reducing tooling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11173559B2Bevel gear cutter and blade consolidation
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 THE GLEASON WORKS
  • US11173559B2 patent drawing
  • US11173559B2 patent drawing
  • US11173559B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method directed to gear cutting tools and gear cutter job consolidation resulting in a single cutter capable of cutting a plurality of different members of a part family. The method comprises a multi-step approach comprising a first step of defining a temporary master. A second step creates a virtual master which is especially well-suited for accommodating the requirements of the jobs in the consolidation variety. A third step determines cutting depths and optimized machine settings for all consolidation jobs using the virtual master.