Beveled Arrow Ends Manage Radial Forces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Arrows, bolts, and projectiles for bows and crossbows often fracture or crack due to radial forces acting on the inserts and arrowheads, reducing their lifespan.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a tubular shaft with beveled ends, a nock with a tapered annular flange, and an insert with a second tapered annular flange, which redistribute and dissipate radial forces, reducing the likelihood of cracking or fracture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If flat ends perpendicular to the shaft are used, then the arrow is simple to manufacture, but the radial forces cause fracture or cracking of the shaft

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidresistance to fracture
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curvature by replacing the flat ends with beveled surfaces that form angled interfaces. The beveled surfaces create a tapered configuration that distributes radial forces more evenly across the shaft end, preventing stress concentration that leads to fracture. This geometric modification maintains manufacturability while significantly improving structural reliability under radial loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The beveled surfaces are strategically positioned at the critical interface between the shaft and the insert/nock to locally enhance force distribution. By concentrating the beveling at these specific locations rather than modifying the entire shaft, the design achieves improved fracture resistance at the stress-prone areas while keeping the rest of the shaft structure simple and easy to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If beveled ends are used to reduce radial forces, then the shaft fracture resistance improves, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to fractureVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The beveled surface is segmented into distinct angular regions that can be independently controlled. The first and second beveled surfaces are positioned at specific angles relative to the shaft axis, creating discrete zones of force distribution. This segmentation allows for optimized force management while keeping each individual bevel region relatively simple to manufacture using standard machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design utilizes parameter changes by varying the angles and dimensions of the beveled surfaces to optimize the balance between fracture resistance and manufacturing complexity. By adjusting parameters such as the bevel angle, bevel width, and surface depth, the design achieves adequate fracture protection with minimal added complexity, allowing manufacturers to select appropriate parameters based on their capabilities and performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9482502B2Beveled end pieces for an arrow
Publication Date: 2016.11.01 MCP IP LLC
  • US9482502B2 patent drawing
  • US9482502B2 patent drawing
  • US9482502B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example nocks, arrowheads and/or arrowhead inserts include a tapered annular flange axially engaging a correspondingly tapered edge on a tubular arrow shaft. The tapered flange and edge help prevent the end of tubular arrow shaft from deforming radially outward when substantial axial force is applied to the nock, arrowhead and/or arrowhead insert.