Multi-pack Packaging System for Beverage Variety Packs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for repackaging multiple varieties of beverages into variety packs are inefficient and require costly automation systems.

Innovation Solution

A conveyor-based system with linear actuators that selectively remove and reconfigure rows of bottles from single-flavor cases to create multi-variety cases, allowing for the automatic creation of variety packs with different numbers of rows in each case, enabling the efficient combination of multiple beverage varieties into a single package.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual repackaging methods are used to create variety packs, then flexibility in creating different pack configurations is maintained, but labor intensity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveOperational flexibilityVSAvoidTime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the repackaging process into distinct functional modules: conveyor-based case positioning, row-specific actuator selection, bottle group extraction, and targeted deposition. Each actuator handles specific rows independently, allowing parallel processing of multiple cases simultaneously, thereby reducing overall time consumption while maintaining operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamically controllable actuators that can be selectively activated based on the specific variety pack configuration required. The conveyor speed, actuator activation timing, and bottle transfer timing are all dynamically adjusted to optimize both speed and flexibility for different repackaging scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If automated repackaging systems are implemented, then productivity and speed increase, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRepackaging speedVSAvoidSystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs universal actuators that can handle multiple rows and serve multiple cases simultaneously. Each actuator is designed to be multi-functional, capable of extracting bottles from any position and depositing them into any target case, thereby reducing the total number of actuators needed and simplifying the overall system while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the existing case structure and bottle arrangement on the conveyor as part of the sorting mechanism. Cases are self-positioned on the conveyor, and bottles are self-sorted based on their row position and target case requirements, reducing the need for additional complex sorting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If rows of bottles are selectively removed and reconfigured, then variety pack customization is enabled, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePack configuration flexibilityVSAvoidSystem implementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Cases are pre-positioned on the conveyor in a standardized sequence before the repackaging process begins. The system pre-identifies which rows need to be transferred to which cases based on the desired variety pack configuration, allowing for simplified real-time execution of the repackaging operation without complex on-the-fly decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8733069B2Multi-pack packaging system
Publication Date: 2014.05.27 J LIEB FOODS
  • US8733069B2 patent drawing
  • US8733069B2 patent drawing
  • US8733069B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for combining units from among a plurality of packages are disclosed. In some embodiments, units are combined from a plurality of single-variety packages to provide one or more variety packs. For example, a plurality of single-variety packages arranged in repeating order of variety can be provided. The single-variety packages being so arranged can define at least two lanes extending among the plurality of single-variety packages. At least one single-variety group of units can be selected from at least one of the plurality of single-variety packages. Each of the selected at least one single-variety group of units can be positioned in one of the lanes. The selected at least one single-variety group of units can be repositioned to another package and within the one of the lanes.