Bezel Geometry Correction via Acceleration Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for acquiring the geometry of spectacle frame bezels, particularly in strongly curved and tilted frames, fail to provide precise results due to the feeler sliding off the bezel's bottom edge, leading to inaccuracies in lens fitting.

Innovation Solution

A method that identifies and corrects anomaly zones in the palpated curve by analyzing the feeler's acceleration and speed, using threshold values based on the frame's curvature, to ensure precise tracing of the bezel's geometry, involving re-feeling or interpolation to reconstruct the correct curve.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple feeling method is used for strongly curved frames, then the operation is simple and fast, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to feeler sliding off the bezel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of feeling operationVSAvoidprecision of bezel geometry acquisition
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a first feeling of the bezel to obtain initial geometry data, then using acceleration analysis to identify anomaly zones before performing a second targeted feeling only in those zones. This preliminary detection phase allows the system to prepare correction strategies in advance, ensuring high precision without requiring complex real-time adjustments during the main measurement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by analyzing the acceleration of the feeler during the feeling operation to detect anomaly zones where the feeler slides off the bezel. This feedback mechanism uses the measured acceleration data to identify problematic areas, which then triggers a correction phase where those specific zones are re-measured. The feedback loop ensures that measurement precision is maintained by continuously monitoring and correcting deviations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If the feeler is manually controlled during feeling, then the device complexity is low, but the measurement precision deteriorates in highly curved zones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of feeling deviceVSAvoidaccuracy of longitudinal strand tracing
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the system to automatically detect anomaly zones through acceleration analysis and autonomously determine which zones require re-measurement. The system serves itself by using its own measurement data to identify errors and trigger corrections without external intervention. This maintains low device complexity while achieving high precision through intelligent automated detection and correction protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If a single feeling pass is performed, then the productivity is high, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to undetected anomaly zones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of geometry acquisitionVSAvoidprecision of bezel contour data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the feeling process into distinct phases: a first global feeling pass to obtain overall geometry, an acceleration analysis phase to identify anomaly zones, and a second targeted feeling phase focused only on problematic zones. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high productivity by limiting re-measurement to only necessary areas rather than requiring complete re-measurement of the entire bezel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by performing feeling operations selectively only in identified anomaly zones rather than uniformly across the entire bezel. This partial re-measurement approach provides sufficient precision correction without the excessive time cost of complete re-measurement, optimizing the balance between productivity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2092268B1Method for correcting the geometry of a probed curve
Publication Date: 2019.10.02 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL(COMPAGNIE GENERALE D OPTIQUE)
  • EP2092268B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2092268B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2092268B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for correcting the geometry of a traced curve. The inventive correction method comprises the following steps: a step for searching one or more abnormality areas (S1, S2) in the traced curve (19) and, if one more abnormalities are detected, for correcting the geometry of each abnormality area in the traced curve.