BGP Routing Cost Control for Partial Link Bundle Failures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional BGP networks lack the capability to automatically redirect traffic in case of partial link bundle failures, leading to potential traffic loss, unlike IGP networks that utilize bandwidth-aware MPLS-TE mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

Implement a mechanism that automatically detects capacity losses in BGP networks using real-time topology telemetry, determines alternate BGP neighbors, and adjusts Accumulated Interior Gateway Protocol (AIGP) costs to reroute traffic, ensuring minimal traffic loss during partial link failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional BGP networks are used without automatic traffic redirection capability, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is maintained, but traffic loss occurs during partial link bundle failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic loss preventionVSAvoidrouting optimization mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism that monitors link bundle capacity and automatically adjusts BGP costs to redirect traffic. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of failure detection and traffic rerouting, preventing traffic loss while isolating the complexity from the core BGP routing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by automatically detecting capacity losses and triggering cost adjustments without manual intervention. The mechanism monitors its own state and autonomously optimizes routing decisions, eliminating the need for external control while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual cost adjustment via CLI commands is used, then device complexity is minimized, but productivity is reduced due to manual operations required for each failure event

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic rerouting speedVSAvoidmanual CLI operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects capacity losses and triggers cost adjustments without requiring manual CLI operations. This self-service mechanism continuously monitors network state and autonomously executes routing optimizations, dramatically improving productivity while maintaining ease of operation through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback loop where capacity loss detection triggers automatic cost adjustment, which in turn redirects traffic. This closed-loop feedback system continuously adapts to network conditions, enabling rapid response to failures without manual intervention and maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If bandwidth-aware MPLS-TE mechanisms are implemented in BGP networks, then traffic loss is prevented during partial failures, but device complexity increases compared to conventional BGP

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic loss preventionVSAvoidrouting mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter being optimized from bandwidth-based (MPLS-TE) to cost-based (BGP). By modifying BGP cost parameters dynamically based on capacity loss detection, the system achieves traffic loss prevention using existing BGP infrastructure, reducing device complexity compared to implementing full MPLS-TE mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using bandwidth-aware mechanisms to directly control traffic flow (MPLS-TE approach), the patent inverts the approach by using cost parameter adjustments to indirectly influence routing decisions. This inversion leverages existing BGP routing logic to achieve the same reliability goals with reduced complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS20260067201A1Systems and methods to optimize routing in BGP (border gateway protocol) networks
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US20260067201A1 patent drawing
  • US20260067201A1 patent drawing
  • US20260067201A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the subject disclosure may include, for example, detecting whether a bandwidth capacity loss occurs on a first link bundle connecting one or more first core routers of a core Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) network with one or more first provider routers, resulting in a detected capacity loss, wherein communication between the one or more first core routers of the core IGP network and the one or more first provider routers utilizes a Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), wherein a second link bundle connects one or more second core routers of the core IGP network with one or more second provider routers, and wherein communication between the one or more second core routers of the core IGP network and one or more second provider routers utilizes the BGP; responsive to the detected capacity loss, automatically increasing a cost associated with selected network traffic that was to be carried between the one or more first provider routers and the one or more first core routers of the core IGP network and that will instead be re-directed for communication via the second link bundle; and causing communication via the second link bundle of the selected network traffic, wherein the communication via the second link bundle of the selected network traffic is between the one or more second provider routers and the one or more second core routers of the core IGP network. Other embodiments are disclosed.