BI Ecosystem Self-Optimization for Artifact and Metadata Bottlenecks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Business intelligence (BI) ecosystems face challenges due to sub-optimal design, implementation, configuration, resource bottlenecks, and inefficiencies, which can increase maintenance costs and reduce utility, despite advancements in data collection and analysis capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A computer-assisted system analyzes BI ecosystems to identify candidate improvements, applies selected improvements, and quantitatively verifies their effectiveness, focusing on BI artifacts, metadata models, data sources, and environment configurations to enhance efficiency and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If BI ecosystems are improved through manual analysis and optimization, then utility and performance may be enhanced, but time consumption and resource requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveBI ecosystem utilityVSAvoidoptimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-diagnosis and self-optimization of BI ecosystems through machine learning models that automatically analyze artifacts, identify improvements, and implement optimizations without requiring extensive manual intervention, thereby maintaining high utility while reducing time consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual analysis and optimization processes are replaced with automated computer-based systems using machine learning algorithms and AI models that can rapidly evaluate BI artifacts and implement improvements, substituting human mechanical analysis with computational automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive analysis of BI artifacts is performed to identify all possible improvements, then improvement quality increases, but system complexity and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimprovement qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The comprehensive analysis process is divided into modular components including artifact analysis modules, improvement identification modules, and verification modules that can independently process different aspects of BI artifacts, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive analysis capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Machine learning models and AI algorithms serve as intermediary layers between raw BI artifacts and improvement recommendations, automatically processing complex analysis tasks and translating them into actionable insights without requiring direct complex system interactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple candidate improvements are evaluated and tested, then the likelihood of finding optimal improvements increases, but execution time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimprovement effectivenessVSAvoidevaluation throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering and prioritization of candidate improvements using machine learning models that predict effectiveness before full evaluation, allowing the most promising improvements to be tested first while reducing the need to evaluate all possible candidates in detail

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where results from evaluating candidate improvements are fed back into the machine learning models to refine future evaluations and predictions, improving efficiency over time while maintaining high reliability in identifying effective improvements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12547952B1System and method for computer-assisted improvement of business intelligence ecosystem
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 MOTIO
  • US12547952B1 patent drawing
  • US12547952B1 patent drawing
  • US12547952B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In various implementations, improvement of a business intelligence ecosystem may include analyzing component(s) of a business intelligence ecosystem, identifying candidate improvements, applying at least a portion of candidate improvements, and/or verifying effects of the candidate improvements. Candidate improvements for business intelligence artifact(s), underlying data sources, BI environment configurations, metadata models, and/or computing resources may be analyzed and identified.