Bi-functional 3D Grid for Building Component Interchangeability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The design and build process in construction is hindered by the lack of compatibility and interchangeability between different software tools and products from various manufacturers, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs due to translation errors and data incompatibility.

Innovation Solution

A digital platform utilizing a bi-functional 3D grid for dimensional and positional coordination, enabling the creation of interchangeable building components and systems, with a library of integrated assemblies that enforce standard dimensions and placement rules, allowing for flexible and efficient design and build processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If different software tools are used for different phases of the design and build process, then each tool can be optimized for its specific phase, but translation errors and data incompatibility occur between tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool optimizationVSAvoiddata compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal data structure that can represent building information across multiple phases and tools. This data structure serves as a common language that all software tools can read and write, eliminating translation errors while preserving the ability of each tool to be optimized for its specific phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary data structure that acts as a bridge between different software tools. This intermediary layer translates between tool-specific formats and a standardized representation, ensuring data compatibility without requiring changes to the optimized phase-specific tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If products from different manufacturers are used, then customer choices increase, but interchangeability and compatibility between products decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct selectionVSAvoidproduct interchangeability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by standardizing the dimensional and positional parameters of building products. By enforcing standard grid alignments and dimensional increments, products from different manufacturers can be interchangeably used as long as they conform to the standardized parameters, maintaining both selection freedom and compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If particular design and build tools support only products from single or limited vendors, then data compatibility is maintained, but customer choices and flexibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata compatibilityVSAvoidvendor selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal data structure that can represent products from any vendor in a standardized format. This allows design tools to support multiple vendors without sacrificing data compatibility, as all vendor-specific products are translated into the universal representation that maintains consistent data structures and relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230052254A1Digital platform for a design and build process
Publication Date: 2023.02.16 UNITY BUILDING TECH INC
  • US20230052254A1 patent drawing
  • US20230052254A1 patent drawing
  • US20230052254A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-aided design method for a building comprises the step of receiving, by a processor, an object to be placed in a grid that represents at least a subset of a building, the grid including a macro grid and a micro grid. The type of the object is determined by the processor. Based at least in part on determining that the type of the object is shell, the processor provides a user with the macro grid for placing the object, otherwise the processor provides the user with the micro grid for placing the object. A segment size of grid lines displayed in the macro grid is larger than the segment size of the grid lines displayed in the micro grid. The object is placed in a location in the grid based at least in part on instructions received from the user, and the grid is displayed to the user.