Bi-layer Thermal Barrier Coating for CMAS Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) in gas turbines are susceptible to degradation due to the infiltration of CMAS (calcia, magnesia, alumina, and silica) species, leading to premature spallation and reduced service life, especially in dusty environments, as they lack sufficient strain tolerance and scalability.

Innovation Solution

A bi-layer coating system comprising an inner layer with high thermal resistance and fracture toughness, and an outer layer resistant to CMAS infiltration, where the interface between the layers is designed to maintain a surface temperature below the CMAS melting point upon spallation, thereby extending the service life by arresting further spalling and providing continued thermal protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high-rare-earth TBCs are used to resist CMAS infiltration, then CMAS resistance is improved, but fracture toughness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCMAS resistanceVSAvoidfracture toughness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The coating system is divided into two distinct layers: an inner layer providing fracture toughness and thermal protection, and an outer layer providing CMAS resistance. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized for its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite coating system combining two different materials with complementary properties. The inner layer uses a material optimized for toughness and thermal insulation, while the outer layer uses a material optimized for CMAS resistance, creating a composite structure that achieves both requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Temperature

If TBC thickness is increased to improve thermal protection, then thermal resistance is improved, but scalability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal protectionVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The coating is segmented into two layers with different thickness requirements. The inner layer provides the bulk of thermal protection and can be optimized for thermal performance, while the outer layer provides CMAS resistance and can be applied at standard thicknesses, making the overall system scalable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional 8YSZ TBC is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but CMAS resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidCMAS resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The coating system separates the CMAS resistance function into a dedicated outer layer, allowing the inner layer to use conventional 8YSZ material that is easy to manufacture. This segmentation enables the use of simple, well-understood materials in the inner layer while providing enhanced protection through the outer layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The bi-layer coating system effectively resists CMAS infiltration and spallation, maintaining thermal protection and extending the service life of turbine components by ensuring the remaining coating thickness provides adequate thermal insulation even after spallation, thus preventing rapid failure.

Implementation Method 1

The inner layer has, in a temperature range from about 1000 degrees Celsius to about 1200 degrees Celsius, a thermal resistance in a range from about 9×10−5 degree Kelvin per watt to about 23×10−5 degree Kelvin per watt

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal resistance: Thermal Insulation

Implementation Method 2

The outer layer is more resistant to infiltration by nominal CMAS relative to 8 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia at a temperature of 1300 degrees Celsius

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical resistance:

Implementation Method 3

These species can adhere to TBCs and damage them through the formation of various comparatively low-melting point phases collectively referred to as 'CMAS'

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal stress: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS10221703B2Articles having damage-tolerant thermal barrier coating
Publication Date: 2019.03.05 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US10221703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An article having a damage-tolerant thermal barrier coating includes a plurality of coating layers disposed over a substrate. The plurality of coatings comprises an inner layer and an outer layer. The outer layer is more resistant to infiltration by nominal CMAS relative to 8 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia at a temperature of 1300 degrees Celsius. The inner layer has, in a temperature range from about 1000 degrees Celsius to about 1200 degrees Celsius, a thermal resistance in a range from about 9.times.10.sup.-5 degree Kelvin per watt to about 23.times.10.sup.-5 degree Kelvin per watt.