Bi-Level Adaptive Equalizer for Short and Long Conductors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Communication systems face challenges in optimizing signal equalization for both short and long conductors without incurring significant cost, power consumption, or performance trade-offs, as existing solutions like retimer circuits or redriver settings often fail to provide optimal performance for both conductor types.

Innovation Solution

A bi-level adaptive equalizer system that dynamically determines whether a conductor is short or long during link training, applying specific equalization settings based on threshold comparisons and rapid bi-level adaptation, enabling efficient signal compensation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If retimer circuits are used to optimize signal equalization for long conductors, then signal performance for long conductors is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal performanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The equalizer dynamically switches between two predefined equalization settings (first setting for short conductors, second setting for long conductors) based on detected conductor length. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize signal performance for different conductor types without requiring complex continuous adjustment mechanisms or retimer circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the equalization parameter (equalization setting) based on the detected conductor length. By having two distinct equalization settings corresponding to short and long conductors, the system adapts its behavior to match the specific transmission conditions, thereby improving signal performance without adding device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple equalization settings are implemented to support both short and long conductors, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The equalizer dynamically selects between two predefined equalization settings based on the detected conductor length. This dynamic switching mechanism provides adaptability for both short and long conductors while maintaining relatively simple device architecture, as the system only requires two fixed settings rather than continuous adjustment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The equalization function is segmented into two distinct modes or settings: one optimized for short conductors and another for long conductors. This segmentation allows the system to provide specialized optimization for each conductor type without requiring a single complex continuous adjustment mechanism, thereby balancing adaptability with device simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If continuous equalization adjustment is implemented, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequalization precisionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The equalizer dynamically switches between two predefined equalization settings based on detected conductor length rather than continuously adjusting. This dynamic switching provides sufficient adaptation precision for different conductor types while consuming significantly less power than continuous adjustment mechanisms would require.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs equalization setting selection periodically during link training rather than continuously during operation. By determining the appropriate equalization setting once during initialization and then maintaining that setting, the system achieves necessary precision without the continuous energy consumption that would result from ongoing adjustment operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Measurement precision

If link training period is extended for accurate conductor length detection, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconductor length detection accuracyVSAvoidlink training time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The link training process is segmented into two phases: a first training period using the first equalization setting to detect conductor length, and a second training period using the second equalization setting to verify the detection. This segmented approach allows for accurate measurement while maintaining relatively short overall training time by using fixed settings rather than continuous adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary conductor length detection during the first link training period using the first equalization setting before committing to the final equalization configuration. This preliminary action allows for accurate detection to be completed early in the training process, minimizing the total time required while ensuring measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4029148B1Bi-level adaptive equalizer
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • EP4029148B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4029148B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4029148B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

At least some aspects of the present disclosure provide for a method (500). In at least one examples, the method includes applying first equalization to a received data signal to generate an equalizer signal (510) and comparing the equalized signal to each of a plurality of reference voltages for a predetermined period of time per respective reference voltage to generate a comparison result (520). The method further includes determining a plurality of counts with each count of the plurality of counts uniquely corresponding to a number of rising edges in the comparison result for each of the plurality of reference voltages (525). The method further includes comparing at least one of the plurality of counts to at least another of the plurality of counts to determine a relationship among the plurality of counts (535) and applying second equalization to the received data signal based on the determined relationship among the plurality of counts (540).