Bi-Level Optimization Model for Transportation Infrastructure Restoration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for restoring transportation infrastructure after disruptive events are inefficient and costly, as they fail to effectively consider unmet demand in transportation systems, leading to biased restoration results and significant material and human costs.

Innovation Solution

A bi-level optimization model is introduced that combines travel time and unmet demand to measure transportation system resilience, using Elastic User Equilibrium (EUE) to select road sections for restoration and allocate resources, with the upper level problem optimizing road section selection and resource allocation, and the lower level problem modeling traveler behavior and network-flow assignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional restoration methods are used that focus only on travel time, then travel time may be reduced, but unmet demand is not considered leading to biased restoration results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal travel timeVSAvoidrestoration plan quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used to evaluate restoration plans by introducing a comprehensive resilience measure that combines both travel time and unmet demand. This dual-parameter approach transforms the single-dimensional evaluation (travel time only) into a multi-dimensional evaluation system, allowing for more balanced and reliable restoration decisions that consider both efficiency and service coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If more road sections are restored, then system resilience improves, but material and human costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem resilienceVSAvoidmaterial and human cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the restoration optimization problem by changing the objective function parameters to include both resilience improvement and cost considerations. The bi-level optimization model uses resilience measure (combining travel time and unmet demand) as the upper-level objective while incorporating cost constraints, enabling decision-makers to achieve the best resilience improvement within limited budgetary and resource constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If limited budget is constrained, then resource allocation must be optimized, but restoration effectiveness may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebudget constraintVSAvoidrestoration effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses budget constraints by transforming the restoration planning into a bi-level optimization problem where the upper level maximizes resilience measure subject to budget constraints, and the lower level models traveler behavior. This parameter transformation allows for optimal allocation of limited resources to achieve maximum restoration effectiveness within the given budget, rather than simply reducing restoration scope.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11321648B1System and method for infrastructure restoration plan optimization
Publication Date: 2022.05.03 UNIV OF SOUTH FLORIDA
  • US11321648B1 patent drawing
  • US11321648B1 patent drawing
  • US11321648B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for transportation infrastructure restoration, assuming limited budget constraints and considering unmet demand in the system for maximizing transportation system resilience is provided.