Bi-Spring Surgical Hammer Impact Tool with Motor-Driven Eccentric Cam

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Orthopedic surgeons face challenges with existing surgical impact tools that require hammers or pneumatic tools, leading to joint stress and limited tool orientation due to the need for air hoses.

Innovation Solution

A bi-spring surgical impact tool with a housing, elongated drive rod, impact shuttle, and motor-driven mechanism, featuring a force control mechanism that adjusts impact force through a shaft helix and rotary member with detents, allowing for battery-powered operation and reduced user fatigue.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a hammer or pneumatic tool is used to transmit impaction force, then the surgical procedure can be performed, but the physician experiences joint stress and user fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpaction forceVSAvoidjoint stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional manual hammering mechanical system with a motor-driven impact tool that uses an eccentric cam mechanism to generate controlled impacts. The motor rotates an eccentric cam that converts rotational motion into linear impact motion, eliminating the need for the physician to manually wield a hammer and thereby reducing joint stress while maintaining effective impaction force delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Force

If a pneumatic impact tool is used, then impaction force can be delivered, but the tool orientation is limited due to air hose connection requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpaction forceVSAvoidtool orientation
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a pneumatic motor that operates independently of external air hose connections. The pneumatic motor is self-contained within the tool housing, allowing the tool to be oriented and positioned freely during surgical procedures without the constraints imposed by external pneumatic supply lines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Productivity

If manual hammering is used, then the surgical procedure can be performed, but the operation becomes tiresome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical efficiencyVSAvoiduser fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The impact tool is designed to be self-operating once activated. The motor automatically generates the impact forces through the eccentric cam mechanism without requiring continuous manual intervention. The physician simply positions the tool and activates it, and the system self-regulates the impact delivery, significantly reducing user fatigue and improving surgical efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If a motor-driven impact mechanism is implemented, then user fatigue is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser fatigueVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tool is divided into distinct functional modules: a motor housing containing the pneumatic motor, an eccentric cam mechanism for impact generation, a broach holder for tool attachment, and a handgrip for physician control. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies assembly, maintenance, and sterilization while managing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The bi-spring surgical impact tool provides a robust, efficient, and ergonomic solution for delivering controlled impact forces, reducing user fatigue and enhancing tool orientation flexibility during surgical procedures.

Implementation Method 1

a first spring disposed against a first end of the impact shuttle; a second spring disposed against a second end of the impact shuttle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a motor having a drive shaft; and a partial tooth pinion attached to the drive shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12004793B2Bi-Spring surgical hammer impact tools
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 ZIMMER INC
  • US12004793B2 patent drawing
  • US12004793B2 patent drawing
  • US12004793B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are bi-spring surgical hammer impact tools and methods of use thereof. The bi-spring surgical hammer impact tools can include an elongated drive rod disposed in the housing and including an impact flange in a mid-region thereof. A tool implement can be mounted to a first end of the elongated drive rod. An impact shuttle can be mounted on the elongated drive rod and can include first and second impact surfaces opposing opposite faces of the impact flange. A plurality of annular teeth can be defined by an exterior surface of the impact shuttle. First and second springs can be disposed against opposite ends of the impact shuttle. A partial tooth pinion attached to a drive shaft and movable for engagement with the plurality of annular teeth of the impact shuttle can be included.