Bi-Swing Gate Lock with Retractable Door Stops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bi-swing gate locking systems are difficult to install and maintain, prone to vandalism, and cannot accommodate misalignments between the gate and posts, with mechanisms that are expensive and easily damaged.

Innovation Solution

A bi-swing gate lock using an electric actuator with a failsafe mode that automatically unlatches during emergencies, featuring retractable door stops with polyurethane pads redirecting loads to the gate post, and a sensor to detect gate positions, ensuring the gate remains locked with power applied.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional locking mechanisms are used, then the gate can be locked, but the mechanism is easily damaged and expensive to repair

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to vandalismVSAvoidcost to manufacture and repair
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into separate functional components: swing arms for latching, polyurethane pads for load distribution, and an electric actuator for control. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and replaces expensive traditional mechanisms with simpler, more durable parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses polyurethane pads combined with metal swing arms and electric actuators to create a composite locking system. The polyurethane material provides shock absorption and load distribution, while the metal components provide structural strength, creating a system that is both durable and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If rigid locking mechanisms are used, then the gate can be securely locked, but the mechanism cannot tolerate misalignments between the gate and posts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking securityVSAvoidaccommodation of misalignments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The swing arms are designed to pivot dynamically, allowing them to adjust to misalignments between the gate and posts. The polyurethane pads can compress and deform to accommodate position variations, while the electric actuator provides controlled movement to maintain proper latching despite alignment issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism changes physical parameters such as the angle and position of the swing arms, and the compression of polyurethane pads, to adapt to different alignment conditions. This allows the locking mechanism to maintain security while tolerating misalignments up to certain limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If complex latching mechanisms are used to ensure secure locking, then the gate can be locked reliably, but the device becomes difficult to install and maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidinstallation and maintenance difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking function is extracted from complex traditional mechanisms and implemented through simple swing arms that pivot on posts. The electric actuator handles the control functions, separating the mechanical latching from the control systems and simplifying both installation and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The swing arms and polyurethane pads are designed to self-adjust and self-latch without requiring complex control mechanisms or frequent maintenance. The electric actuator provides automated control, reducing the need for manual intervention and simplifying operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If failsafe mode is implemented to automatically unlatch during emergencies, then safety is improved, but the system requires continuous electric power to maintain locked state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during emergenciesVSAvoidelectric power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring continuous power to maintain locking, the system uses power to maintain the unlocked state and spring-loaded mechanisms to automatically lock when power is lost. This inversion of the traditional approach ensures safety during power failures while reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

Spring-loaded mechanisms are pre-installed to provide automatic locking action in case of power failure. These springs are charged beforehand and automatically engage the swing arms when power is lost, ensuring safety without requiring continuous power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a rugged, reliable, and inexpensive gate lock that withstands vandalism and accommodates misalignments, ensuring secure operation and easy installation, while maintaining the gate's locked state with power and automatically unlocking during emergencies.

Implementation Method 1

Loads trying to force open a locked gate are redirected through polyurethane pads on the sides of the retractable door stops directly to the insides of matching pockets within the post

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

an electric actuator to unlatch the gate on request

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

the loss of power automatically unlocks the traplock and spring pressure pulls in the retractable door stops

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS8186729B2Traplock for bi-swing gate
Publication Date: 2012.05.29 DUDLEY DAVID
  • US8186729B2 patent drawing
  • US8186729B2 patent drawing
  • US8186729B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bi-swing gate lock uses an electric actuator to unlatch the gate on request, and a failsafe mode that automatically unlatches the gate during emergencies or power failures. The traplock uses two swing arms that pivot retractable door stops in and out on either side of a closed gate from a stationary 4″ post. Loads trying to force open a locked gate are redirected through polyurethane pads on the sides of the retractable door stops directly to the insides of matching pockets within the post. Such loads can flex the swing arms, but significant loads will not reach the swing arm pivot bearings. Keeping the gate locked requires electric power applied to a lock actuator, and the loss of power automatically unlocks the traplock. Power applied to a retraction actuator pushes out the retractable door stops. A sensor detects when the gate returns to a closed position and the lock actuator can be energized once again.