Bias Eliminated Performance Determination Using Biological Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine learning models are prone to incorporating human biases, which can lead to inaccurate performance determinations.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that utilize biological feedback from users to compare with performance parameters, generating performance determinations through a machine learning model and classifying them to bias categories to eliminate bias.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If machine learning models are used for performance determination, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to incorporation of human biases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance determination efficiencyVSAvoidperformance determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces biological feedback data as an intermediary element that mediates between the machine learning model and the performance determination process. This biological feedback serves as a mediator to counterbalance human biases incorporated in the ML model, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used in performance determination by incorporating biological feedback parameters (physiological, behavioral, cognitive data) alongside traditional performance metrics. This parameter expansion allows the system to account for individual differences and reduce bias, improving measurement accuracy without sacrificing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If machine learning models incorporate human biases, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel structure simplicityVSAvoidperformance determination trustworthiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where biological feedback data is continuously collected and used to adjust and refine performance determinations. This feedback loop enhances reliability by providing ongoing validation and correction of ML model outputs, making the system more trustworthy without increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If bias classification is added to the system, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebias detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the machine learning model to serve multiple functions: it simultaneously performs performance determination and bias detection/classification. This multi-functionality allows the system to improve measurement precision through bias classification without proportionally increasing device complexity, as the same computational infrastructure serves dual purposes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250139512A1Apparatus for bias eliminated performance determination
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 GMECI LLC
  • US20250139512A1 patent drawing
  • US20250139512A1 patent drawing
  • US20250139512A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an aspect, an apparatus for bias eliminated performance determination is presented. An Apparatus includes at least a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor. A memory includes instructions configuring at least a processor to receive, through a sensing device, biological feedback of a user. At least a processor is configured to compare biological feedback to a performance parameter of a task. At least a processor is configured to generate, as a function of a comparison, a performance determination through a performance determination machine learning model. At least a processor is configured to classify a performance determination to a bias category as a function of a bias classifier. At least a processor is configured to train a performance determination machine learning model with biological feedback and a bias classification of a performance determination.