Bias Term Adjustment in Deep Neural Networks for Object Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional deep neural networks face challenges in efficiently classifying objects with high computational complexity and sensitivity, particularly when there is prior knowledge that an object has an increased probability of being present in the input, leading to false positives and incorrect classifications.

Innovation Solution

The method involves adjusting the bias of activation functions in deep neural networks without altering the weights, to increase sensitivity to elements with a higher probability of presence, thereby refining the output based on prior knowledge without changing the filter weights or causing hallucinations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional deep neural networks are used for object classification, then the network can process inputs through standard activation functions, but the computational complexity becomes prohibitively high and sensitivity to prior knowledge is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the bias parameter of activation functions dynamically based on prior knowledge about object probability. By adjusting the bias term rather than retraining all weights, the system incorporates prior knowledge efficiently without prohibitively increasing computational complexity, thereby improving classification reliability while managing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the network increases sensitivity to elements with higher probability of presence, then classification accuracy improves, but false positives may increase if prior knowledge is incorrectly applied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic adjustment of bias terms based on the specific input and prior knowledge relevance. The bias is not fixed but adapted dynamically - increasing sensitivity only when prior knowledge appropriately applies, thereby improving detection sensitivity while controlling false positive rates through conditional application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If weights of the network are adjusted to incorporate prior knowledge, then sensitivity to known objects increases, but the trained filter weights may be altered causing hallucinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection sensitivityVSAvoidtraining integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and applies only the bias component separately from the trained weights. By taking out the bias term as an independent adjustable parameter and modifying only that while preserving the originally trained weights, the system increases detection sensitivity without altering the integrity of the training and causing hallucinations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10325202B2Incorporating top-down information in deep neural networks via the bias term
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 QUALCOMM INC
  • US10325202B2 patent drawing
  • US10325202B2 patent drawing
  • US10325202B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of biasing a deep neural network includes determining whether an element has an increased probability of being present in an input to the network. The method also includes adjusting a bias of activation functions of neurons in the network to increase sensitivity to the element. In one configuration, the bias is adjusted without adjusting weights of the network. The method further includes adjusting an output of the network based on the biasing.