Biased Quantizer Control for Buck-Boost Ripple Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Buck-boost power converters experience non-linearities and ripple on the output voltage due to transitions between buck and boost modes, which can lead to inefficiencies and discontinuities, especially when output and input voltages are close.

Innovation Solution

A modulator with a biased quantizer is used to generate switching signals for a switching circuit, biasing the control variable to increase the probability of alternating between buck and boost modes within a predetermined range, minimizing the buck-boost 'dead zone' and reducing ripple.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the switching circuit operates in buck-boost mode when output voltage is close to input voltage, then the voltage conversion capability is improved, but non-linearities and ripple on output voltage occur due to mode transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage conversion capabilityVSAvoidoutput voltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The quantizer applies a bias to the control variable before mode transition to anticipate and prevent excessive switching between buck and boost modes. This preliminary action reduces the frequency of mode transitions and their associated non-linearities and output voltage ripple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter of the control variable by applying a bias that varies based on the previous switching cycle's operational mode. This dynamic parameter adjustment smooths mode transitions and reduces output voltage ripple while maintaining voltage conversion capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the switching circuit frequently transitions between buck and boost modes, then the voltage regulation flexibility is improved, but efficiency decreases due to non-linearities and discontinuities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage regulation flexibilityVSAvoidconversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By applying a bias to the control variable in advance of mode transitions, the quantizer reduces the frequency of transitions between buck and boost modes. This preliminary action maintains voltage regulation flexibility while improving conversion efficiency by minimizing the energy losses associated with frequent mode switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The bias applied to the control variable is periodic in nature, alternating based on the previous switching cycle's mode. This periodic action creates a rhythm that prevents excessive mode transitions, thereby improving efficiency while preserving regulatory flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Stability of the object's composition

If continuous operation in buck-boost mode is implemented, then the mode transition discontinuities are eliminated, but efficiency is negatively impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput voltage continuityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The quantizer applies a partial bias to the control variable only when necessary, i.e., when the control variable is within a predetermined difference from a boundary between operational modes. This partial action maintains output voltage continuity without the excessive energy consumption that would result from continuous buck-boost mode operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The bias parameter is dynamically adjusted based on the control variable's proximity to mode transition boundaries and the previous switching cycle's mode. This parameter change strategy ensures output voltage continuity while optimizing efficiency by applying bias only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250350191A1Systems and methods for buck-boost ripple reduction using biased quantizer
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 CIRRUS LOGIC INT SEMICON LTD
  • US20250350191A1 patent drawing
  • US20250350191A1 patent drawing
  • US20250350191A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may include a modulator configured to generate switching signals for a switching circuit based on a control variable, the modulator comprising a quantizer configured to, for a range of values of the control variable within a predetermined difference from a boundary of the control variable between a first operational mode and a second operational mode of the switching circuit, bias the control variable by a bias amount to increase a probability of operating the switching circuit in the first operational mode for a switching cycle if a previous switching cycle of the switching circuit was in the second operational mode; and increase a probability of operating the switching circuit in the second operational mode for the switching cycle if the previous switching cycle of the switching circuit was in the first operational mode.