Biased Ring Electrode for Directional Stimulation Field Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Implantable medical leads often face challenges in controlling the direction of stimulation fields, particularly during cardiac pacing and neurostimulation, where undesired nerve or muscle stimulation can occur, such as phrenic nerve stimulation during left ventricle pacing and neck muscle stimulation during vagal neurostimulation.

Innovation Solution

The use of biased ring electrodes with varying widths along the longitudinal direction of the lead body, which directs the stimulation field in a specific radial or transverse direction, allowing for targeted tissue stimulation while minimizing unwanted nerve or muscle stimulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a ring electrode with even width is used, then the stimulation field is distributed equally about the perimeter of the lead, but this causes undesired stimulation of adjacent nerves or muscles (e.g., phrenic nerve during LV pacing, neck muscles during vagal neurostimulation)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of electrode designVSAvoidundesired nerve or muscle stimulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by designing a ring electrode with non-uniform width around its perimeter. Specifically, the electrode has a greater width on one side than on the opposite side, creating an asymmetric geometry that biases the stimulation field in a predetermined direction. This asymmetric design allows the stimulation field to be directed away from sensitive structures like the phrenic nerve or neck muscles, thereby reducing undesired stimulation while maintaining the simple ring electrode configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by varying the width of the ring electrode at different locations around its perimeter. The electrode width is specifically increased on the side opposite to where undesired stimulation would occur, creating localized differences in electrical field distribution. This local modification of electrode geometry allows targeted control of the stimulation field direction without requiring complete redesign of the entire electrode structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the lead is specifically positioned to avoid the phrenic nerve, then phrenic nerve stimulation is reduced, but the lead is positioned at a non-optimal site for LV pacing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephrenic nerve stimulationVSAvoidoptimal positioning for LV pacing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric ring electrode design enables the lead to be positioned in the optimal location for LV pacing (in the coronary sinus or coronary vein) without causing phrenic nerve stimulation. The biased geometry of the electrode directs the stimulation field away from the phrenic nerve while maintaining effective contact with the left ventricular myocardium, thus resolving the positioning conflict between optimal pacing site and avoidance of harmful nerve stimulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Ease of manufacture

If ring electrodes are used as an alternative to cuff electrodes for vagal nerve stimulation, then the procedure is simplified, but neck muscles may also be stimulated which is generally undesirable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implantationVSAvoidneck muscle stimulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry to the ring electrode design specifically for vagal nerve stimulation applications. The electrode width is biased to direct the stimulation field preferentially toward the vagal nerve while away from adjacent neck muscles. This asymmetric geometry maintains the procedural simplicity of using a ring electrode instead of a cuff electrode, while simultaneously reducing the harmful side effect of neck muscle stimulation through directional field control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively biases the stimulation field to avoid undesired tissue areas, ensuring precise delivery of therapy and reducing unwanted nerve or muscle stimulation, thereby improving the efficacy of cardiac pacing and neurostimulation treatments.

Implementation Method 1

the width of the ring electrode as measured along the longitudinal direction of the lead may vary about the perimeter of the lead... the stimulation field may be biased toward the portion or 'side' of the lead body where the electrode has an increased surface area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic field distribution: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentEP2195078B1Implantable medical lead with biased electrode
Publication Date: 2013.10.09 MEDTRONIC INC
  • EP2195078B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2195078B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP2195078B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

This disclosure describes implantable medical leads that include a lead body and an electrode. A width of the electrode as measured along a longitudinal direction of the lead varies about the perimeter of the lead. The uneven width of the electrode may bias a stimulation field in a particular direction, e.g., a radial or transverse direction relative to the longitudinal axis of the lead. Electrodes with an uneven width may be useful for controlling the direction of propagation of the stimulation field in order to, for example, avoid phrenic nerve stimulation during LV pacing or neck muscle stimulation during vagal neurostimulation.