Bicomponent Fiber Crimp Contraction via Polyether Blending

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bicomponent fibers made from poly(trimethylene terephthalate) lack substantial crimp contraction, dyeability, and softness, particularly when both components contain significant amounts of the same poly(trimethylene terephthalate) without incorporating polyether-based components.

Innovation Solution

A bicomponent fiber is developed where the first component comprises 60-100% poly(trimethylene terephthalate) and the second component includes poly(trimethylene terephthalate) blended with polyalkylene ether repeating units, such as poly(alkylene ether) glycol, to achieve improved crimp contraction and dyeability, with a weight ratio of at least 30:70 and up to 70:30, forming side-by-side or sheath-core structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If bicomponent fibers are made from poly(trimethylene terephthalate) without polyether-based components, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but crimp contraction, dyeability, and softness are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcrimp contraction performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining poly(trimethylene terephthalate) with polyether-based components (poly(alkylene ether) glycol or polyether ester copolymer) to create a bicomponent fiber with enhanced crimp contraction, dyeability, and softness. The first component is substantially poly(trimethylene terephthalate) while the second component contains polyether elements that provide the desired performance improvements without compromising manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If both components contain substantial amounts of the same poly(trimethylene terephthalate), then material consistency is maintained, but crimp contraction and dyeability are inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial consistencyVSAvoiddyeability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating distinct functional zones within the bicomponent fiber structure. The first component is substantially poly(trimethylene terephthalate) providing structural integrity, while the second component contains polyether-based materials that provide enhanced dyeability and softness. This local differentiation of material properties within the fiber structure enables both material consistency and improved performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If polyether-based components are incorporated into bicomponent fibers, then crimp contraction and dyeability are improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedyeabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the fiber into two distinct components with different material compositions and functions. The first component is substantially poly(trimethylene terephthalate) while the second component contains polyether-based materials. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining a relatively simple bicomponent manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If polyether-based components are added to achieve softness and dyeability, then fiber performance is enhanced, but the number of polymer components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesoftnessVSAvoidnumber of polymer components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies multi-functionality by designing the second component to provide multiple benefits simultaneously. The polyether-based component (poly(alkylene ether) glycol or polyether ester copolymer) contributes to crimp contraction, dyeability, and softness all at once. This approach enhances fiber performance across multiple dimensions without requiring separate additions for each property, thereby limiting the increase in component complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8758660B2Process of making high crimp bicomponent fibers
Publication Date: 2014.06.24 COVATION INC
  • US8758660B2 patent drawing
  • US8758660B2 patent drawing
  • US8758660B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bicomponent fiber wherein (a) the first component comprises from about 90 to 100 wt. % poly(trimethylene terephthalate) and (b) the second component is a polymer composition comprising (i) poly(trimethylene terephthalate) and (ii) polymer containing polyalkylene ether repeating units. Yarn, fiber, fabrics and carpets comprising the bicomponent fiber, as well as the process of making the bicomponent fiber, yarn, fabric, and carpet.