Proximity-Based Bicycle Alarm Using Capacitive Touch Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Simple bicycle locks are ineffective against determined thieves and fail to draw attention to potential thefts, especially when disabled without drawing attention.

Innovation Solution

A proximity-based alarm system integrated into the bicycle frame, featuring a touch sensor, communication module, and controller, which outputs audible and visual alerts and transmits signals to the owner upon detection of unauthorized access or attempted disablement, using a capacitive or conductive force to detect proximity and a shock sensor to detect tampering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a simple bicycle lock is used, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of theft prevention is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft prevention effectivenessVSAvoidalarm system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm system is divided into separate functional modules: touch sensor for proximity detection, shock sensor for tamper detection, communication module for remote notification, and controller for system management. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while maintaining overall system reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The alarm system integrates multiple detection methods (touch sensing, shock sensing) and communication capabilities into a single device that can prevent theft through multiple mechanisms simultaneously. The system serves both as a local deterrent with audible/visual alarms and as a remote notification system, providing multi-functional theft prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a basic lock is used, then the ease of operation is high, but the ability to draw attention to potential theft is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft deterrence capabilityVSAvoidsensor and alert system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm system applies preliminary anti-action by detecting proximity through touch sensors before theft can occur and activating audible and visual alerts to deter the would-be thief. The shock sensor provides additional preliminary protection by detecting tampering attempts and triggering alerts before the thief can disable the system or remove the bicycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The alarm system incorporates visual alert mechanisms including LED lights that change color or illuminate to draw attention to potential theft attempts. This visual signaling works in conjunction with audible alarms to create a multi-sensory deterrent that is difficult for thieves to ignore or disable quietly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Reliability

If no remote communication capability is added, then the device complexity remains low, but the ability to notify the owner of attempted theft is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft notification reliabilityVSAvoidcommunication module complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The communication module provides feedback to the bicycle owner by transmitting notifications of proximity events and tamper attempts to a remote device. This feedback loop allows the owner to be immediately informed of potential theft attempts and take appropriate action, such as locating the bicycle or contacting authorities, thereby enhancing theft prevention reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The communication module acts as an intermediary between the alarm system sensors and the bicycle owner, transmitting detection data and alerts through wireless communication networks. This intermediary function enables reliable notification without requiring direct physical presence or complex hardwired connections to the owner's devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively deters theft by alerting nearby individuals and the owner of potential theft attempts, providing a visual and audible warning and preventing unauthorized use or disablement of the alarm system.

Implementation Method 1

The alarm system may be configured to output an alarm signal based on a proximity of a person to the frame (110). The proximity may be detected by, e.g., a capacitive or electrically conductive force established between the person and the frame (110).

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive force: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

The proximity may be detected by, e.g., a capacitive or electrically conductive force established between the person and the frame (110).

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConductive force: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 3

The alarm system may include a shock sensor configured to detect forces applied to the touch sensor. Therefore, should someone attempt to disable the touch sensor by, e.g., breaking the touch sensor with a tool such as a hammer, the alert signal will be triggered.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce detection: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS10336385B2Proximity-based bicycle alarm
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10336385B2 patent drawing
  • US10336385B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An alarm system for a vehicle, such as a bicycle, includes a touch sensor electrically connected to a vehicle frame. The touch sensor outputs an alarm signal based on a proximity of a person to the vehicle frame. A communication module receives signals from a remote device. A controller is programmed to selectively enable and disable the touch sensor in response to signals received from the remote device.