Bicycle Clamping Device with Automatic Cycling State Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing clamping devices for bicycles lack security and operational convenience, particularly for novice riders who may experience '0-velocity crashes' due to delayed unlocking in emergency situations, as they require manual rotation of both feet to unlock.

Innovation Solution

A clamping device with a control module that acquires cycling information such as pedaling frequency and acceleration to automatically lock or unlock the device based on the cycling state, using sensors and a driving motor to rotate the clamping device body relative to the locking sheet.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual rotation of feet is used to unlock the clamping device, then the device structure remains simple, but the security and operation convenience deteriorate due to delayed unlocking in emergency situations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping device automatically detects cycling state through sensors (acceleration sensor, pedaling frequency sensor) and self-adjusts the locking state without requiring manual intervention from the cyclist. The control module processes sensor data and automatically controls the driving motor to lock or unlock the device based on detected cycling conditions, making the system serve itself rather than requiring continuous human operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical manual unlocking system with an integrated electromechanical system. Sensors detect cycling state and convert mechanical motion into electrical signals, the control module processes these signals electronically, and the driving motor converts electrical commands back into mechanical rotation to adjust the locking state, substituting manual mechanical operation with an automated electromechanical control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If automatic locking and unlocking control is implemented based on cycling state, then operation convenience improves, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control modules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation convenienceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors cycling state through integrated sensors and automatically adjusts locking status without requiring the cyclist to manually operate the device. The control module processes sensor data in real-time and automatically commands the driving motor to lock or unlock based on detected conditions, making the system self-regulating and eliminating the need for manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control module serves multiple functions: it receives and processes signals from multiple different sensors (acceleration sensor, pedaling frequency sensor), determines cycling state based on various parameters, and controls the driving motor to adjust locking status. This multi-functional integration allows a single control module to handle sensing, processing, decision-making, and actuation, reducing the need for separate dedicated components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If the clamping device remains locked during braking, then pedaling frequency maintenance is improved, but harmful factors increase due to '0-velocity crash' risk when braking stops the bicycle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedaling frequencyVSAvoidcrash risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses acceleration sensors to continuously monitor the bicycle's motion state and provides feedback to the control module. When the acceleration sensor detects that the bicycle has stopped (zero velocity condition during or after braking), this feedback triggers the control module to automatically unlock the clamping device, preventing the cyclist from falling off. The feedback loop continuously monitors and adjusts the locking state based on real-time cycling conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control module proactively unlocks the clamping device when it detects braking conditions or zero velocity states, performing the unlocking action before the cyclist would naturally need to do so manually. By detecting the braking state in advance through acceleration sensors and automatically initiating the unlocking sequence, the system prevents the harmful situation of being locked during or after stopping, rather than waiting for the problem to occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10399634B2Clamping device, method for controlling the same, pedal and bicycle
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
  • US10399634B2 patent drawing
  • US10399634B2 patent drawing
  • US10399634B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a clamping device including a clamping device body, and a control module connected to the clamping device body, wherein the control module is configured to acquire cycling information and control locking and unlocking of the clamping device body based on the cycling information.