Bicycle Control Lever Arrangement for Ergonomic Shift Actuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Integrated control devices for curved bicycle handlebars face ergonomics issues due to the arrangement of gearshift levers, which can lead to involuntary actuation and production complexities, such as tight seals required for the small lever's movement.

Innovation Solution

The control device features a support body with an articulated brake lever and a pair of control levers for gear ratio control, arranged one above the other behind the brake lever, allowing distinct finger specialization and optimized pivot points for better lever effect during actuation, along with a cam surface to amplify displacement and prevent involuntary switch actuation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If control levers are arranged side by side behind the brake lever, then gearshift control is achieved, but involuntary actuation occurs and production complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegearshift controlVSAvoidinvoluntary actuation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control levers are divided into two separate levers (first control lever and second control lever) positioned one above the other, allowing independent actuation by different fingers. This segmentation prevents involuntary actuation by ensuring that only the intended finger can trigger each lever, while maintaining separate control functions for gearshift operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control levers are arranged vertically one above the other rather than horizontally side by side. This dimensional change in arrangement allows each lever to be accessed by different fingers (e.g., index finger for the upper lever, middle finger for the lower lever), providing distinct tactile feedback and preventing confusion or involuntary actuation between the two control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a small lever is added for gearshift control, then gear ratio control is achieved, but production complexity and seal requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear ratio controlVSAvoidproduction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control levers are designed to serve multiple functions: they control the gearshift mechanism and can also be used to actuate the brake lever when needed. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components, simplifying production while maintaining versatile control capabilities for both gear ratio adjustment and braking operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Volume of moving object

If control levers are positioned close to the handlebars, then compactness is achieved, but distinguishability and control precision are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol device sizeVSAvoidlever distinguishability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The control levers are positioned at different vertical heights (one above the other) with distinct control regions that can be differentiated by tactile feedback and spatial location. This local differentiation in position and geometry allows the cyclist to easily distinguish between the two levers and apply precise control to each, even when the overall device remains compact near the handlebars.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This arrangement enhances ergonomics by reducing involuntary actuations, improving the cyclist's ability to distinguish levers and optimizing the lever effect, while the cam surface ensures a perceivable control lever movement and prevents actuation by small oscillations or vibrations.

Implementation Method 1

a cam surface configured to amplify a displacement of the driven region caused by the rotation of the control lever into a larger displacement of a cam follower associated with the cam surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Implementation Method 2

a brake lever for controlling the brake, articulated at an upper end thereof, the pivot axis of the brake lever being substantially horizontal and forward with respect to the handlebars

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever principle: Lever

Implementation Method 3

The control levers are arranged behind the brake lever. The control regions of the pair of control levers are arranged one above the other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS11958564B2Manual control device for a bicycle
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 CAMPAGNOLO SRL
  • US11958564B2 patent drawing
  • US11958564B2 patent drawing
  • US11958564B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated control device is provided, having a support body configured for attachment to curved bicycle handlebars. The support body has a brake lever for controlling the brake, and a pair of control levers. The pair of control levers are configured for manual operation. Each control lever has a respective control region and the control regions of the pair of control levers are arranged behind the brake lever and above each other.