Bicycle Automatic Control Reset for Rider Preference Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing human-powered vehicles with automatic control systems struggle to adapt to individual rider preferences and intentions, particularly in ride-sharing scenarios where multiple riders with different preferences use the same vehicle.

Innovation Solution

A human-powered vehicle control device and method that allows resetting of automatic control settings based on rider interventions, using a processor to learn and adjust parameters according to predetermined conditions, such as specific operations or travel speed changes, and notifying the rider of the reset.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If automatic control parameters are continuously optimized through learning rider interventions, then the control system becomes more personalized and adaptive to individual rider preferences, but the system cannot adapt quickly when riders change (ride-sharing scenario)

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdaptability to individual rider preferencesVSAvoidTime to reset optimization settings
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-stores multiple rider profiles with their respective optimized control parameters in the memory unit. When a rider identifies themselves (e.g., through authentication), the system immediately retrieves and applies their pre-optimized parameters without requiring real-time learning, thus avoiding time loss while maintaining personalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different rider profiles based on rider identification. The control parameters are not fixed but adaptively change according to which rider profile is active, enabling quick adaptation to different riders in ride-sharing scenarios while maintaining individualized optimization for each rider.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the system learns and changes control parameters based on rider interventions, then the automatic control becomes more accurate to rider intentions, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAccuracy of control to rider intentionsVSAvoidComplexity of learning and parameter management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors rider interventions (manual overrides of automatic control) and uses this feedback to refine and update the control parameters for each rider profile. This continuous feedback loop improves accuracy of control alignment with rider intentions while maintaining a manageable complexity through iterative learning rather than complex initial design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and stores copies of optimized control parameters for different rider profiles in memory. Instead of maintaining one complex adaptive system, it replicates the learned parameters across multiple rider-specific profiles, reducing the complexity of real-time decision-making while maintaining high accuracy for each rider.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system resets parameters to predetermined data when predetermined conditions are satisfied, then the system can quickly adapt to rider changes, but the personalized optimization is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAbility to adapt to rider changesVSAvoidReliability of personalized control settings
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-prepares multiple rider profiles with their personalized parameters stored in memory. When a rider change is detected, the system switches to the appropriate pre-prepared profile rather than resetting to default, thus maintaining both adaptability to rider changes and reliability of personalized settings simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the active parameter set based on rider identification rather than resetting parameters. It selects from pre-stored parameter sets corresponding to different riders, enabling quick adaptation while preserving the reliability of personalized optimizations for each identified rider.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250271866A1Human-powered vehicle control device, method of controlling human-powered vehicle, and computer program
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 SHIMANO INC
  • US20250271866A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271866A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271866A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A human-powered vehicle control device includes a processor configured to read information from a memory and execute processing. The processor is further configured to execute processing of acquiring input information related to traveling of a human-powered vehicle, performing automatic control on a controlled device provided to the human-powered vehicle by control data of the controlled device, the control data being decided based on the input information acquired, changing, based on the input information, a parameter related to automatic control of the controlled device through learning an intervening operation performed on the automatic control by a rider, and resetting the parameter related to the automatic control, which is changed through learning, to predetermined data in a case where a predetermined condition is satisfied.