Bicycle Fork Slot Routing for Hidden Cable Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bicycle fork structures fail to effectively hide controlling cables, leading to exposure and vulnerability to degradation, rusting, and breakage due to wind, rain, and sunlight, especially when the number of cables increases, making it difficult to assemble and maintain the bicycle while compromising the appearance.

Innovation Solution

A bicycle fork structure with a monolithic carbon fiber design featuring a slot with openings on either side, restricting grooves, and a cover system that allows controlling cables to pass through, providing a secure and hidden pathway from the stem to the frame, enhancing cable protection and assembly efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If controlling cables are fixed using a tie conventionally, then the installation is simple, but the cables cannot be effectively hidden and remain exposed outside the bicycle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable installation simplicityVSAvoidcable hiding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements cable routing by nesting the controlling cables within the fork structure. The cables are routed through the steerer tube and along the inner surface of the fork, effectively hiding them within the bicycle's structural components rather than exposing them externally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the vertical dimension by routing cables through the steerer tube and along the inner surface of the fork in a vertical pathway. This dimensional approach allows cables to be concealed within the fork's height rather than requiring horizontal routing that would expose them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of controlling cables increases, then the braking and shifting functionality is improved, but the difficulty in hiding the cables is enhanced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking and shifting functionalityVSAvoidcable routing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cable routing pathway into distinct sections: the steerer tube for initial cable entry, the inner surface of the fork for intermediate routing, and the slot near the fork tip for final cable exit. This segmentation allows multiple cables to be organized and routed separately through defined pathways, reducing routing complexity despite increased cable quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fork structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides structural support for the bicycle, contains the cable routing pathway within its geometry, and offers protection for the cables. This multi-functionality allows the same structure to handle multiple cables without requiring additional external routing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If controlling cables are exposed outside the bicycle, then the structure is simple, but the cables are vulnerable to degradation, rusting, and breakage from wind, rain, and sunlight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidcable durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the fork's structure as a protective shell that encloses and shields the controlling cables. The fork acts as a physical barrier protecting cables from environmental factors such as wind, rain, and sunlight, thereby improving cable durability without requiring additional protective coatings or films.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The fork structure serves as an intermediary between the external environment and the controlling cables. By routing cables through the fork's internal pathways rather than externally, the fork mediates protection against environmental degradation while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Shape

If the fork is disposed vertical to the stem with an angle between them, then the bicycle geometry is optimized, but it becomes difficult for cables to pass from the stem interior to the fork interior and frame interior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebicycle geometryVSAvoidcable routing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a pre-designed slot in the fork structure near its tip, positioned to facilitate cable exit. This preliminary structural feature is built into the fork during manufacturing, providing a predetermined pathway that simplifies cable routing despite the angled geometry between the stem and fork.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The slot in the fork acts as an intermediary pathway that bridges the angular gap between the stem interior and fork interior. This dedicated routing channel mediates the transition of cables through the angled joint, maintaining both the optimized bicycle geometry and ease of cable installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240367746A1Bicycle fork structure
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 TIEN HSIN INDS
  • US20240367746A1 patent drawing
  • US20240367746A1 patent drawing
  • US20240367746A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A bicycle fork structure is a fork including a steerer tube, a first crown, and a second crown that are integrally formed as a monolithic unit. An end of the steerer tube opens along a vertical direction to form a slot with two openings that are respectively located on two sides of the slot. Another end of the steerer tube is connected to an end of the first crown and an end of the second crown. The first crown and the second crown are respectively located on another two sides of the slot that are not provided with the two openings. The slot is adapted to receive at least one controlling cable. With the slot having the two openings on the two sides of the slot, the controlling cable could conveniently pass from a stem to a frame, thereby casing the difficulty in hiding the controlling cable.